Attributions, parental anger and risk of maltreatment

Aileen M. Pidgeon, Matthew R. Sanders

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this chapter we examined the differences in the attributions clinically angry, atrisk of child maltreatment parents (CA), and non-angry, not at-risk of child maltreatment parents (NA) make for parent-child interactions. Participants were 82 families with a child aged 2-7 years. There were significant differences between the CA and NA mothers' anger- intensifying attributional style for both negative and ambiguous negative child behaviour and anger-justifying attributions for negative parenting behaviour. The CA mothers reported an elevated level of anger-intensifying attributional style where the CA group tended to attribute negative and ambiguous negative child behaviour to internal and stable causes in the child and rated the behaviour as more intentional and blameworthy. CA mothers were also more likely to attribute blame to their child for their own negative parenting behaviour and perceive the reason for their behaviour was unlikely to change and that their behaviour was part of their personality (e.g. "That's the way I am. I yell and hit my children"). The study suggests that targeting parents' anger-intensifying and angerjustifying attributions may enhance outcomes in parenting interventions and reduce the risk of child maltreatment.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationApplied Public Health
Subtitle of host publicationExamining Multifaceted Social or Ecological Problems and Child Maltreatment
EditorsJ. R. Lutzker, J Merrick
PublisherNova Science Publishers
Chapter14
Pages191-206
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781620813881
ISBN (Print)9781620813560
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Anger
Child Abuse
Parenting
Child Behavior
Parents
Mothers
Personality

Cite this

Pidgeon, A. M., & Sanders, M. R. (2012). Attributions, parental anger and risk of maltreatment. In J. R. Lutzker, & J. Merrick (Eds.), Applied Public Health: Examining Multifaceted Social or Ecological Problems and Child Maltreatment (pp. 191-206). Nova Science Publishers.
Pidgeon, Aileen M. ; Sanders, Matthew R. / Attributions, parental anger and risk of maltreatment. Applied Public Health: Examining Multifaceted Social or Ecological Problems and Child Maltreatment. editor / J. R. Lutzker ; J Merrick. Nova Science Publishers, 2012. pp. 191-206
@inbook{ebb9afe4b42f4f5b97d7eadc8585603a,
title = "Attributions, parental anger and risk of maltreatment",
abstract = "In this chapter we examined the differences in the attributions clinically angry, atrisk of child maltreatment parents (CA), and non-angry, not at-risk of child maltreatment parents (NA) make for parent-child interactions. Participants were 82 families with a child aged 2-7 years. There were significant differences between the CA and NA mothers' anger- intensifying attributional style for both negative and ambiguous negative child behaviour and anger-justifying attributions for negative parenting behaviour. The CA mothers reported an elevated level of anger-intensifying attributional style where the CA group tended to attribute negative and ambiguous negative child behaviour to internal and stable causes in the child and rated the behaviour as more intentional and blameworthy. CA mothers were also more likely to attribute blame to their child for their own negative parenting behaviour and perceive the reason for their behaviour was unlikely to change and that their behaviour was part of their personality (e.g. {"}That's the way I am. I yell and hit my children{"}). The study suggests that targeting parents' anger-intensifying and angerjustifying attributions may enhance outcomes in parenting interventions and reduce the risk of child maltreatment.",
author = "Pidgeon, {Aileen M.} and Sanders, {Matthew R.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781620813560",
pages = "191--206",
editor = "Lutzker, {J. R.} and J Merrick",
booktitle = "Applied Public Health",
publisher = "Nova Science Publishers",

}

Pidgeon, AM & Sanders, MR 2012, Attributions, parental anger and risk of maltreatment. in JR Lutzker & J Merrick (eds), Applied Public Health: Examining Multifaceted Social or Ecological Problems and Child Maltreatment. Nova Science Publishers, pp. 191-206.

Attributions, parental anger and risk of maltreatment. / Pidgeon, Aileen M.; Sanders, Matthew R.

Applied Public Health: Examining Multifaceted Social or Ecological Problems and Child Maltreatment. ed. / J. R. Lutzker; J Merrick. Nova Science Publishers, 2012. p. 191-206.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Attributions, parental anger and risk of maltreatment

AU - Pidgeon, Aileen M.

AU - Sanders, Matthew R.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - In this chapter we examined the differences in the attributions clinically angry, atrisk of child maltreatment parents (CA), and non-angry, not at-risk of child maltreatment parents (NA) make for parent-child interactions. Participants were 82 families with a child aged 2-7 years. There were significant differences between the CA and NA mothers' anger- intensifying attributional style for both negative and ambiguous negative child behaviour and anger-justifying attributions for negative parenting behaviour. The CA mothers reported an elevated level of anger-intensifying attributional style where the CA group tended to attribute negative and ambiguous negative child behaviour to internal and stable causes in the child and rated the behaviour as more intentional and blameworthy. CA mothers were also more likely to attribute blame to their child for their own negative parenting behaviour and perceive the reason for their behaviour was unlikely to change and that their behaviour was part of their personality (e.g. "That's the way I am. I yell and hit my children"). The study suggests that targeting parents' anger-intensifying and angerjustifying attributions may enhance outcomes in parenting interventions and reduce the risk of child maltreatment.

AB - In this chapter we examined the differences in the attributions clinically angry, atrisk of child maltreatment parents (CA), and non-angry, not at-risk of child maltreatment parents (NA) make for parent-child interactions. Participants were 82 families with a child aged 2-7 years. There were significant differences between the CA and NA mothers' anger- intensifying attributional style for both negative and ambiguous negative child behaviour and anger-justifying attributions for negative parenting behaviour. The CA mothers reported an elevated level of anger-intensifying attributional style where the CA group tended to attribute negative and ambiguous negative child behaviour to internal and stable causes in the child and rated the behaviour as more intentional and blameworthy. CA mothers were also more likely to attribute blame to their child for their own negative parenting behaviour and perceive the reason for their behaviour was unlikely to change and that their behaviour was part of their personality (e.g. "That's the way I am. I yell and hit my children"). The study suggests that targeting parents' anger-intensifying and angerjustifying attributions may enhance outcomes in parenting interventions and reduce the risk of child maltreatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013639258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781620813560

SP - 191

EP - 206

BT - Applied Public Health

A2 - Lutzker, J. R.

A2 - Merrick, J

PB - Nova Science Publishers

ER -

Pidgeon AM, Sanders MR. Attributions, parental anger and risk of maltreatment. In Lutzker JR, Merrick J, editors, Applied Public Health: Examining Multifaceted Social or Ecological Problems and Child Maltreatment. Nova Science Publishers. 2012. p. 191-206