Assessment of standing in Functional Capacity Evaluations: An exploration of methods used by a sample of occupational therapists

Anna Nicholls, Libby Gibson, Kryss McKenna, Marion Gray, Trish Wielandt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of the study was to explore the current practice of occupational therapists when assessing standing performance during Functional Capacity Evaluations (FCEs). Methods: A semi-structured interview was conducted with occupational therapists and the participants were interviewed using both open and closed questions. Participants: A sample of occupational therapists (n=20) from Queensland, Australia were involved in a survey. They were all experienced in conducting FCEs. Results: Ninety percent of the respondents used a distracting task during the assessment of standing with standardised and non-standardised nuts and bolts assembly tasks the most commonly used. Respondents reported using a mix of biophysical, physiological and psychophysical clinical observations to assess standing. The nuts and bolts assembly activities used by the respondents were rated to be of low interest in terms of engaging the client. Conclusions: It was identified there are minimal guidelines in the literature which focuses on assessment of standing in FCEs. Questions were raised regarding the adequacy of the use of nuts and bolts activities as a suitably distracting task in FCEs and further research is required on assessing standing in functional capacity evaluation including the use of suitably distracting activities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-153
Number of pages9
JournalWork
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Queensland
Occupational Therapists
Guidelines
Interviews
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Nicholls, Anna ; Gibson, Libby ; McKenna, Kryss ; Gray, Marion ; Wielandt, Trish. / Assessment of standing in Functional Capacity Evaluations : An exploration of methods used by a sample of occupational therapists. In: Work. 2011 ; Vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 145-153.
@article{e55579c84c26451a9e1a22814a2150b0,
title = "Assessment of standing in Functional Capacity Evaluations: An exploration of methods used by a sample of occupational therapists",
abstract = "Objective: The primary aim of the study was to explore the current practice of occupational therapists when assessing standing performance during Functional Capacity Evaluations (FCEs). Methods: A semi-structured interview was conducted with occupational therapists and the participants were interviewed using both open and closed questions. Participants: A sample of occupational therapists (n=20) from Queensland, Australia were involved in a survey. They were all experienced in conducting FCEs. Results: Ninety percent of the respondents used a distracting task during the assessment of standing with standardised and non-standardised nuts and bolts assembly tasks the most commonly used. Respondents reported using a mix of biophysical, physiological and psychophysical clinical observations to assess standing. The nuts and bolts assembly activities used by the respondents were rated to be of low interest in terms of engaging the client. Conclusions: It was identified there are minimal guidelines in the literature which focuses on assessment of standing in FCEs. Questions were raised regarding the adequacy of the use of nuts and bolts activities as a suitably distracting task in FCEs and further research is required on assessing standing in functional capacity evaluation including the use of suitably distracting activities.",
author = "Anna Nicholls and Libby Gibson and Kryss McKenna and Marion Gray and Trish Wielandt",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.3233/WOR-2011-1116",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "145--153",
journal = "Work",
issn = "1051-9815",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "2",

}

Assessment of standing in Functional Capacity Evaluations : An exploration of methods used by a sample of occupational therapists. / Nicholls, Anna; Gibson, Libby; McKenna, Kryss; Gray, Marion; Wielandt, Trish.

In: Work, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2011, p. 145-153.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of standing in Functional Capacity Evaluations

T2 - An exploration of methods used by a sample of occupational therapists

AU - Nicholls, Anna

AU - Gibson, Libby

AU - McKenna, Kryss

AU - Gray, Marion

AU - Wielandt, Trish

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Objective: The primary aim of the study was to explore the current practice of occupational therapists when assessing standing performance during Functional Capacity Evaluations (FCEs). Methods: A semi-structured interview was conducted with occupational therapists and the participants were interviewed using both open and closed questions. Participants: A sample of occupational therapists (n=20) from Queensland, Australia were involved in a survey. They were all experienced in conducting FCEs. Results: Ninety percent of the respondents used a distracting task during the assessment of standing with standardised and non-standardised nuts and bolts assembly tasks the most commonly used. Respondents reported using a mix of biophysical, physiological and psychophysical clinical observations to assess standing. The nuts and bolts assembly activities used by the respondents were rated to be of low interest in terms of engaging the client. Conclusions: It was identified there are minimal guidelines in the literature which focuses on assessment of standing in FCEs. Questions were raised regarding the adequacy of the use of nuts and bolts activities as a suitably distracting task in FCEs and further research is required on assessing standing in functional capacity evaluation including the use of suitably distracting activities.

AB - Objective: The primary aim of the study was to explore the current practice of occupational therapists when assessing standing performance during Functional Capacity Evaluations (FCEs). Methods: A semi-structured interview was conducted with occupational therapists and the participants were interviewed using both open and closed questions. Participants: A sample of occupational therapists (n=20) from Queensland, Australia were involved in a survey. They were all experienced in conducting FCEs. Results: Ninety percent of the respondents used a distracting task during the assessment of standing with standardised and non-standardised nuts and bolts assembly tasks the most commonly used. Respondents reported using a mix of biophysical, physiological and psychophysical clinical observations to assess standing. The nuts and bolts assembly activities used by the respondents were rated to be of low interest in terms of engaging the client. Conclusions: It was identified there are minimal guidelines in the literature which focuses on assessment of standing in FCEs. Questions were raised regarding the adequacy of the use of nuts and bolts activities as a suitably distracting task in FCEs and further research is required on assessing standing in functional capacity evaluation including the use of suitably distracting activities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951666435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/WOR-2011-1116

DO - 10.3233/WOR-2011-1116

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 145

EP - 153

JO - Work

JF - Work

SN - 1051-9815

IS - 2

ER -