Assessment of reliability and validity of the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS)

Sudhir Kale, Peter Dubelaar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This research sought to assess the reliability and validity of Raylu and Oei's (2004) widely used Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS). Two samples were used in this study. In the "teenage sample," 2,000 teenagers, aged 15-19, completed a web-based survey containing questions related to a host of gambling-related issues, including GRCS. The "university sample" comprised of 764 international students and 836 domestic students sampled from three universities in Australia. Our research used the same items as those utilized by Raylu and Oei (2004). After our exploratory factor analysis of the scale items yielded two factors for both samples, we tried to fit the five-factor model of GRCS to both datasets. Despite trying various approaches to achieve model fit, our data did not provide any evidence of the five factors underlying GRCS. However, the scale exhibited excellent concurrent validity and internal reliability across both samples. This research corroborates Taylor et al.'s (2013) suggestion that external independent validation of the GRCS is needed before it can be applied for diagnosis or treatment purposes, particularly among younger people.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-44
Number of pages20
JournalGambling Research
Volume25
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

gambling
cognition
university
factor analysis
student
evidence

Cite this

Kale, Sudhir ; Dubelaar, Peter. / Assessment of reliability and validity of the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS). In: Gambling Research. 2013 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 25-44.
@article{20252de00b50412aa6f4b30edd4d4e87,
title = "Assessment of reliability and validity of the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS)",
abstract = "This research sought to assess the reliability and validity of Raylu and Oei's (2004) widely used Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS). Two samples were used in this study. In the {"}teenage sample,{"} 2,000 teenagers, aged 15-19, completed a web-based survey containing questions related to a host of gambling-related issues, including GRCS. The {"}university sample{"} comprised of 764 international students and 836 domestic students sampled from three universities in Australia. Our research used the same items as those utilized by Raylu and Oei (2004). After our exploratory factor analysis of the scale items yielded two factors for both samples, we tried to fit the five-factor model of GRCS to both datasets. Despite trying various approaches to achieve model fit, our data did not provide any evidence of the five factors underlying GRCS. However, the scale exhibited excellent concurrent validity and internal reliability across both samples. This research corroborates Taylor et al.'s (2013) suggestion that external independent validation of the GRCS is needed before it can be applied for diagnosis or treatment purposes, particularly among younger people.",
author = "Sudhir Kale and Peter Dubelaar",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "25--44",
journal = "Gambling Research",
issn = "1832-4975",
number = "1",

}

Assessment of reliability and validity of the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS). / Kale, Sudhir; Dubelaar, Peter.

In: Gambling Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2013, p. 25-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of reliability and validity of the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS)

AU - Kale, Sudhir

AU - Dubelaar, Peter

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This research sought to assess the reliability and validity of Raylu and Oei's (2004) widely used Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS). Two samples were used in this study. In the "teenage sample," 2,000 teenagers, aged 15-19, completed a web-based survey containing questions related to a host of gambling-related issues, including GRCS. The "university sample" comprised of 764 international students and 836 domestic students sampled from three universities in Australia. Our research used the same items as those utilized by Raylu and Oei (2004). After our exploratory factor analysis of the scale items yielded two factors for both samples, we tried to fit the five-factor model of GRCS to both datasets. Despite trying various approaches to achieve model fit, our data did not provide any evidence of the five factors underlying GRCS. However, the scale exhibited excellent concurrent validity and internal reliability across both samples. This research corroborates Taylor et al.'s (2013) suggestion that external independent validation of the GRCS is needed before it can be applied for diagnosis or treatment purposes, particularly among younger people.

AB - This research sought to assess the reliability and validity of Raylu and Oei's (2004) widely used Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS). Two samples were used in this study. In the "teenage sample," 2,000 teenagers, aged 15-19, completed a web-based survey containing questions related to a host of gambling-related issues, including GRCS. The "university sample" comprised of 764 international students and 836 domestic students sampled from three universities in Australia. Our research used the same items as those utilized by Raylu and Oei (2004). After our exploratory factor analysis of the scale items yielded two factors for both samples, we tried to fit the five-factor model of GRCS to both datasets. Despite trying various approaches to achieve model fit, our data did not provide any evidence of the five factors underlying GRCS. However, the scale exhibited excellent concurrent validity and internal reliability across both samples. This research corroborates Taylor et al.'s (2013) suggestion that external independent validation of the GRCS is needed before it can be applied for diagnosis or treatment purposes, particularly among younger people.

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 25

EP - 44

JO - Gambling Research

JF - Gambling Research

SN - 1832-4975

IS - 1

ER -