Assessing the surgeons technical skills

Analysis of the available tools

Muhammed Ashraf Memon, David Brigden, Manjunath S. Subramanya, Breda Memon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The concept of assessing competency in surgical practice is not new and has taken on an added urgency in view of the recent high-profile inquiries into "botched cases" involving surgeons of various levels in different parts of the world. Until very recently, surgeons in the United Kingdom and other parts of the world, although required to undergo formal and compulsory examinations to test their factual knowledge and decision making, were not required to demonstrate technical ability. Therefore, there existed (and still exist) no objective assessment criteria to test trainees surgical skill, especially during the exit examination, which, if passed, provides unrestricted license to surgeons to practice their specialties. However, with the introduction of a new curriculum by various surgical societies and a demand from the lay community for better standards, new assessment tools are emerging that focus on technical competency and that could objectively and reliably measure surgical skills. Furthermore, training authorities and hospitals are keen to embrace these changes for satisfactory accreditation and reaccreditation processes and to assure the public of the safety of the public and private health care systems. In the United Kingdom, two new surgical tools (Surgical Direct Observation of Procedural Skill, and Procedure Based Assessments) have been simultaneously introduced to assess surgical trainees. The authors describe these two assessment methods, provide an overview of other assessment tools currently or previously used to assess surgical skills, critically analyze the two new assessment tools, and reflect on the merit of simultaneously introducing them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)869-880
Number of pages12
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume85
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Aptitude
trainee
Accreditation
Licensure
Curriculum
Decision Making
Public Health
assessment criteria
examination
Observation
Delivery of Health Care
Safety
accreditation
license
Surgeons
health care
decision making
curriculum
demand
ability

Cite this

Memon, Muhammed Ashraf ; Brigden, David ; Subramanya, Manjunath S. ; Memon, Breda. / Assessing the surgeons technical skills : Analysis of the available tools. In: Academic Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 85, No. 5. pp. 869-880.
@article{fca4f6a686d043b5b753dc803da09c89,
title = "Assessing the surgeons technical skills: Analysis of the available tools",
abstract = "The concept of assessing competency in surgical practice is not new and has taken on an added urgency in view of the recent high-profile inquiries into {"}botched cases{"} involving surgeons of various levels in different parts of the world. Until very recently, surgeons in the United Kingdom and other parts of the world, although required to undergo formal and compulsory examinations to test their factual knowledge and decision making, were not required to demonstrate technical ability. Therefore, there existed (and still exist) no objective assessment criteria to test trainees surgical skill, especially during the exit examination, which, if passed, provides unrestricted license to surgeons to practice their specialties. However, with the introduction of a new curriculum by various surgical societies and a demand from the lay community for better standards, new assessment tools are emerging that focus on technical competency and that could objectively and reliably measure surgical skills. Furthermore, training authorities and hospitals are keen to embrace these changes for satisfactory accreditation and reaccreditation processes and to assure the public of the safety of the public and private health care systems. In the United Kingdom, two new surgical tools (Surgical Direct Observation of Procedural Skill, and Procedure Based Assessments) have been simultaneously introduced to assess surgical trainees. The authors describe these two assessment methods, provide an overview of other assessment tools currently or previously used to assess surgical skills, critically analyze the two new assessment tools, and reflect on the merit of simultaneously introducing them.",
author = "Memon, {Muhammed Ashraf} and David Brigden and Subramanya, {Manjunath S.} and Breda Memon",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d74bad",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "869--880",
journal = "Journal of Medical Education",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

Memon, MA, Brigden, D, Subramanya, MS & Memon, B 2010, 'Assessing the surgeons technical skills: Analysis of the available tools', Academic Medicine, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 869-880. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d74bad

Assessing the surgeons technical skills : Analysis of the available tools. / Memon, Muhammed Ashraf; Brigden, David; Subramanya, Manjunath S.; Memon, Breda.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 85, No. 5, 2010, p. 869-880.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the surgeons technical skills

T2 - Analysis of the available tools

AU - Memon, Muhammed Ashraf

AU - Brigden, David

AU - Subramanya, Manjunath S.

AU - Memon, Breda

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The concept of assessing competency in surgical practice is not new and has taken on an added urgency in view of the recent high-profile inquiries into "botched cases" involving surgeons of various levels in different parts of the world. Until very recently, surgeons in the United Kingdom and other parts of the world, although required to undergo formal and compulsory examinations to test their factual knowledge and decision making, were not required to demonstrate technical ability. Therefore, there existed (and still exist) no objective assessment criteria to test trainees surgical skill, especially during the exit examination, which, if passed, provides unrestricted license to surgeons to practice their specialties. However, with the introduction of a new curriculum by various surgical societies and a demand from the lay community for better standards, new assessment tools are emerging that focus on technical competency and that could objectively and reliably measure surgical skills. Furthermore, training authorities and hospitals are keen to embrace these changes for satisfactory accreditation and reaccreditation processes and to assure the public of the safety of the public and private health care systems. In the United Kingdom, two new surgical tools (Surgical Direct Observation of Procedural Skill, and Procedure Based Assessments) have been simultaneously introduced to assess surgical trainees. The authors describe these two assessment methods, provide an overview of other assessment tools currently or previously used to assess surgical skills, critically analyze the two new assessment tools, and reflect on the merit of simultaneously introducing them.

AB - The concept of assessing competency in surgical practice is not new and has taken on an added urgency in view of the recent high-profile inquiries into "botched cases" involving surgeons of various levels in different parts of the world. Until very recently, surgeons in the United Kingdom and other parts of the world, although required to undergo formal and compulsory examinations to test their factual knowledge and decision making, were not required to demonstrate technical ability. Therefore, there existed (and still exist) no objective assessment criteria to test trainees surgical skill, especially during the exit examination, which, if passed, provides unrestricted license to surgeons to practice their specialties. However, with the introduction of a new curriculum by various surgical societies and a demand from the lay community for better standards, new assessment tools are emerging that focus on technical competency and that could objectively and reliably measure surgical skills. Furthermore, training authorities and hospitals are keen to embrace these changes for satisfactory accreditation and reaccreditation processes and to assure the public of the safety of the public and private health care systems. In the United Kingdom, two new surgical tools (Surgical Direct Observation of Procedural Skill, and Procedure Based Assessments) have been simultaneously introduced to assess surgical trainees. The authors describe these two assessment methods, provide an overview of other assessment tools currently or previously used to assess surgical skills, critically analyze the two new assessment tools, and reflect on the merit of simultaneously introducing them.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953603229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d74bad

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d74bad

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 869

EP - 880

JO - Journal of Medical Education

JF - Journal of Medical Education

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 5

ER -