Abstract
Inflexible use of evidence hierarchies confuses practitioners and irritates researchers. So how can we improve the way we assess research?
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 39-41 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | British Medical Journal |
| Volume | 328 |
| Issue number | 7430 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Jan 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the quality of research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Related Research Outputs
- 326 Citations
- 1 Comment/debate/opinion
-
Corrections: Assessing the quality of research (British Medical Journal (2004) 328 (39-41))
Glasziou, P. & Vandenbroucke, J. P., 11 Sept 2004, In: British Medical Journal. 329, 7466, p. 621 1 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate/opinion › Research
Open Access
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver