Abstract
Inflexible use of evidence hierarchies confuses practitioners and irritates researchers. So how can we improve the way we assess research?
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 39-41 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | British Medical Journal |
| Volume | 328 |
| Issue number | 7430 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Jan 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Cite this
}
Assessing the quality of research. / Glasziou, P; Vandenbroucke, J; Chalmers, Iain.
In: British Medical Journal, Vol. 328, No. 7430, 03.01.2004, p. 39-41.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the quality of research
AU - Glasziou, P
AU - Vandenbroucke, J
AU - Chalmers, Iain
PY - 2004/1/3
Y1 - 2004/1/3
N2 - Inflexible use of evidence hierarchies confuses practitioners and irritates researchers. So how can we improve the way we assess research?
AB - Inflexible use of evidence hierarchies confuses practitioners and irritates researchers. So how can we improve the way we assess research?
U2 - 10.1136/bmj.328.7430.39
DO - 10.1136/bmj.328.7430.39
M3 - Article
VL - 328
SP - 39
EP - 41
JO - BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
JF - BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
SN - 0959-535X
IS - 7430
ER -