Assessing the quality of research

P Glasziou; J Vandenbroucke; Iain Chalmers

doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7430.39

Assessing the quality of research

P Glasziou^*, J Vandenbroucke, Iain Chalmers

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

281 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Inflexible use of evidence hierarchies confuses practitioners and irritates researchers. So how can we improve the way we assess research?

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	39-41
Number of pages	5
Journal	British Medical Journal
Volume	328
Issue number	7430
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7430.39
Publication status	Published - 3 Jan 2004
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1136/bmj.328.7430.39

Cite this

@article{8d416006ac4f4fcd8cfcdb0daadf7440,

title = "Assessing the quality of research",

abstract = "Inflexible use of evidence hierarchies confuses practitioners and irritates researchers. So how can we improve the way we assess research?",

author = "P Glasziou and J Vandenbroucke and Iain Chalmers",

year = "2004",

month = jan,

day = "3",

doi = "10.1136/bmj.328.7430.39",

language = "English",

volume = "328",

pages = "39--41",

journal = "The BMJ",

issn = "0959-535X",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "7430",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the quality of research

AU - Glasziou, P

AU - Vandenbroucke, J

AU - Chalmers, Iain

PY - 2004/1/3

Y1 - 2004/1/3

N2 - Inflexible use of evidence hierarchies confuses practitioners and irritates researchers. So how can we improve the way we assess research?

AB - Inflexible use of evidence hierarchies confuses practitioners and irritates researchers. So how can we improve the way we assess research?

U2 - 10.1136/bmj.328.7430.39

DO - 10.1136/bmj.328.7430.39

M3 - Article

VL - 328

SP - 39

EP - 41

JO - The BMJ

JF - The BMJ

SN - 0959-535X

IS - 7430

ER -

Assessing the quality of research

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this