Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Arguments for 'ocular donation' as standardised terminology to reduce the 'ick factor' of 'eye donation'

  • Katrina A Bramstedt

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveyResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This brief report presents the global problem of the shortfall of donor corneal tissue for transplantation, a potential root cause ('ick factor' language), and a potential solution (modification of 'ick factor' language). Specifically, use of the term 'eye donation' is a potential hurdle to ocular tissue donation as it can stimulate the 'ick factor.' Verbiage such as 'ocular (eye tissue)' could be a method of providing terminology that is less emotive than 'eye donor' or 'eye donation.' The field of transplantation has experienced terminology shifts over time; for example, 'cadaver' has been replaced with 'deceased donor,' 'harvest' has been replaced with 'recover,' and 'life support' has been replaced with 'ventilated.' Notably, only a small number of regions worldwide are using 'ocular' terminology, yet it could be an important step to enhancing the informed consent process and improving donation rates, potentially increasing transplant and optimising patient quality of life for those with treatable blindness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)935-936
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume48
Issue number11
Early online date7 Jan 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2022
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Arguments for 'ocular donation' as standardised terminology to reduce the 'ick factor' of 'eye donation''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this