Abstract
In this paper we investigate the contention that the Fama-French (1993) model's ability to explain cross-sectional variation in equity returns occurs because the Fama-French factors, SMB and HML, are proxying for default risk. To assess the default risk hypothesis, we augment the CAPM and the Fama-French model with a default factor and run system regressions of the default enhanced models using the GMM approach. Our key findings are that: 1) default risk is not priced in equity returns; and, 2) the Fama-French factors are not proxying for default risk. Although our findings suggest that SMB and HML are not proxying for default risk, our analysis indicates that the Fama-French factors are capturing some form of priced risk However, what type of risk the Fama-French factors are capturing remains an open question.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 223-249 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Management |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Are the Fama-French Factors Proxying Default Risk?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver