Are systematic reviews more cost-effective than randomised trials?

P Glasziou, B Djulbegovic, A Burls

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2057-2058
Number of pages2
JournalThe Lancet
Volume367
Issue number9528
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jun 2006
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Glasziou, P ; Djulbegovic, B ; Burls, A. / Are systematic reviews more cost-effective than randomised trials?. In: The Lancet. 2006 ; Vol. 367, No. 9528. pp. 2057-2058.
@article{4ab94766c7b5411e8e9d1cf9ea31fbcd,
title = "Are systematic reviews more cost-effective than randomised trials?",
author = "P Glasziou and B Djulbegovic and A Burls",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68919-8",
language = "English",
volume = "367",
pages = "2057--2058",
journal = "Lancet",
issn = "0140-6736",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "9528",

}

Are systematic reviews more cost-effective than randomised trials? / Glasziou, P; Djulbegovic, B; Burls, A.

In: The Lancet, Vol. 367, No. 9528, 24.06.2006, p. 2057-2058.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are systematic reviews more cost-effective than randomised trials?

AU - Glasziou, P

AU - Djulbegovic, B

AU - Burls, A

PY - 2006/6/24

Y1 - 2006/6/24

U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68919-8

DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68919-8

M3 - Letter

VL - 367

SP - 2057

EP - 2058

JO - Lancet

JF - Lancet

SN - 0140-6736

IS - 9528

ER -