Are some health professionals more cognizant of clinical governance development concepts than others? Findings from a New Zealand study

Robin Gauld*, Simon Horsburgh

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background:
Clinical governance has been promoted in recent years as core to improving patient safety. Effective clinical governance requires partnerships between 'management' and health professionals as well as equal involvement of all professional groups. Professionals must also be willing to engage in clinical governance activities such as working to improve care systems and patient safety. There is limited research into the relative understanding of core clinical governance concepts amongst different professional groups or the extent to which professionals are prepared to take up opportunities to 'change the system'.

Methods:
A 2012 national survey study of health professionals employed in New Zealand health boards sought to probe understanding of and commitment to clinical governance following introduction of a 2009 policy.

Results:
Respondent data showed only limited policy implementation had occurred. Regression analyses revealed statistically significant differences in perceptions of knowledge of clinical governance concepts and structures by gender, age, experience and profession, as well as in seeking opportunities to change the system.

Conclusions:
These findings have implications for policy makers in terms of ensuring that clinical governance implementation provides equal opportunity for engendering involvement of different health professionals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)363-370
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Public Health (United Kingdom)
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2016
Externally publishedYes

Cite this