Are New Zealand's new primary health organisations fit for purpose?

Robin Gauld*, Nicholas Mays

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate/opinionResearchpeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Attempts to make New Zealand's health care more equitable have resulted in rapid change. But the reforms are largely untested and their effects difficult to predict.

Evidence is growing that primary care has a crucial role in healthcare systems.1 Governments therefore need to ensure that they get any reforms right. In the United Kingdom, attempts to improve primary care through competition between existing general practices and new corporate entrants have been suggested to undermine some of its strengths: quality, efficiency, and equity.2 The New Zealand government has also pursued a bold strategy for improving primary care. Irrespective of its merits in principle, the strategy has produced a wide variety of organisations of varying capability and complex funding arrangements. We assess the changes and their likely effects.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1216-1218
Number of pages3
JournalBritish Medical Journal
Volume333
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Dec 2006
Externally publishedYes

Cite this