Are emergency department clinical pathway interventions adequately described, and are they delivered as intended? A systematic review

Raffi Adjemian, Atbin Moradi Zirkohi, Robin Coombs, Sharon Mickan, Christian Vaillancourt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The accurate reproduction of clinical interventions and the evaluation of provider adherence in research publications improve the evaluation and implementation of research findings into clinical practice. We sought to examine the proportion of clinical pathway publications in an emergency department setting that adequately reported the following: (1) the exact reproduction of the clinical pathway that was implemented in the study, (2) the adherence to and correct execution of the clinical pathway intervention, and (3) the presence of a pre-implementation education phase. Methods: We performed a descriptive systematic review of the literature from 2006 to 2015 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL. All types of prospective trial designs were eligible. Validated clinical pathway criteria were used to identify relevant publications. Two reviewers independently collected data using a piloted data abstraction tool. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group Risk of Bias Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: We identified 5947 publications, 44 of which met our inclusion criteria. The formal clinical pathway was fully reproduced in 27 (61%) publications, partially reproduced in 9 (21%), and not reproduced in 8 (18%). Only 14 (32%) studies reported whether at least one decision step was executed correctly. The presence of a pre-implementation education phase was reported in 33 (75%) studies. Conclusion: The underreporting of intervention elements may present a barrier to both the evaluation and accurate replication of clinical pathway interventions. These finding may be useful for the elaboration of complex intervention reporting guidelines, improved reporting in future clinical pathway publications, and improved knowledge translation and exchange of clinical pathway interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)148-161
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Care Coordination
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Critical Pathways
Hospital Emergency Service
Publications
Reproduction
Education
Translational Medical Research
MEDLINE
Guidelines
Research

Cite this

Adjemian, Raffi ; Moradi Zirkohi, Atbin ; Coombs, Robin ; Mickan, Sharon ; Vaillancourt, Christian. / Are emergency department clinical pathway interventions adequately described, and are they delivered as intended? A systematic review. In: International Journal of Care Coordination. 2017 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 148-161.
@article{b543d133351a45a98e5f9675b7e8801d,
title = "Are emergency department clinical pathway interventions adequately described, and are they delivered as intended? A systematic review",
abstract = "Introduction: The accurate reproduction of clinical interventions and the evaluation of provider adherence in research publications improve the evaluation and implementation of research findings into clinical practice. We sought to examine the proportion of clinical pathway publications in an emergency department setting that adequately reported the following: (1) the exact reproduction of the clinical pathway that was implemented in the study, (2) the adherence to and correct execution of the clinical pathway intervention, and (3) the presence of a pre-implementation education phase. Methods: We performed a descriptive systematic review of the literature from 2006 to 2015 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL. All types of prospective trial designs were eligible. Validated clinical pathway criteria were used to identify relevant publications. Two reviewers independently collected data using a piloted data abstraction tool. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group Risk of Bias Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: We identified 5947 publications, 44 of which met our inclusion criteria. The formal clinical pathway was fully reproduced in 27 (61{\%}) publications, partially reproduced in 9 (21{\%}), and not reproduced in 8 (18{\%}). Only 14 (32{\%}) studies reported whether at least one decision step was executed correctly. The presence of a pre-implementation education phase was reported in 33 (75{\%}) studies. Conclusion: The underreporting of intervention elements may present a barrier to both the evaluation and accurate replication of clinical pathway interventions. These finding may be useful for the elaboration of complex intervention reporting guidelines, improved reporting in future clinical pathway publications, and improved knowledge translation and exchange of clinical pathway interventions.",
author = "Raffi Adjemian and {Moradi Zirkohi}, Atbin and Robin Coombs and Sharon Mickan and Christian Vaillancourt",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2053434517732507",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "148--161",
journal = "International Journal of Care Pathways",
issn = "2040-4026",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Are emergency department clinical pathway interventions adequately described, and are they delivered as intended? A systematic review. / Adjemian, Raffi; Moradi Zirkohi, Atbin; Coombs, Robin; Mickan, Sharon; Vaillancourt, Christian.

In: International Journal of Care Coordination, Vol. 20, No. 4, 01.12.2017, p. 148-161.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are emergency department clinical pathway interventions adequately described, and are they delivered as intended? A systematic review

AU - Adjemian, Raffi

AU - Moradi Zirkohi, Atbin

AU - Coombs, Robin

AU - Mickan, Sharon

AU - Vaillancourt, Christian

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Introduction: The accurate reproduction of clinical interventions and the evaluation of provider adherence in research publications improve the evaluation and implementation of research findings into clinical practice. We sought to examine the proportion of clinical pathway publications in an emergency department setting that adequately reported the following: (1) the exact reproduction of the clinical pathway that was implemented in the study, (2) the adherence to and correct execution of the clinical pathway intervention, and (3) the presence of a pre-implementation education phase. Methods: We performed a descriptive systematic review of the literature from 2006 to 2015 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL. All types of prospective trial designs were eligible. Validated clinical pathway criteria were used to identify relevant publications. Two reviewers independently collected data using a piloted data abstraction tool. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group Risk of Bias Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: We identified 5947 publications, 44 of which met our inclusion criteria. The formal clinical pathway was fully reproduced in 27 (61%) publications, partially reproduced in 9 (21%), and not reproduced in 8 (18%). Only 14 (32%) studies reported whether at least one decision step was executed correctly. The presence of a pre-implementation education phase was reported in 33 (75%) studies. Conclusion: The underreporting of intervention elements may present a barrier to both the evaluation and accurate replication of clinical pathway interventions. These finding may be useful for the elaboration of complex intervention reporting guidelines, improved reporting in future clinical pathway publications, and improved knowledge translation and exchange of clinical pathway interventions.

AB - Introduction: The accurate reproduction of clinical interventions and the evaluation of provider adherence in research publications improve the evaluation and implementation of research findings into clinical practice. We sought to examine the proportion of clinical pathway publications in an emergency department setting that adequately reported the following: (1) the exact reproduction of the clinical pathway that was implemented in the study, (2) the adherence to and correct execution of the clinical pathway intervention, and (3) the presence of a pre-implementation education phase. Methods: We performed a descriptive systematic review of the literature from 2006 to 2015 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL. All types of prospective trial designs were eligible. Validated clinical pathway criteria were used to identify relevant publications. Two reviewers independently collected data using a piloted data abstraction tool. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group Risk of Bias Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: We identified 5947 publications, 44 of which met our inclusion criteria. The formal clinical pathway was fully reproduced in 27 (61%) publications, partially reproduced in 9 (21%), and not reproduced in 8 (18%). Only 14 (32%) studies reported whether at least one decision step was executed correctly. The presence of a pre-implementation education phase was reported in 33 (75%) studies. Conclusion: The underreporting of intervention elements may present a barrier to both the evaluation and accurate replication of clinical pathway interventions. These finding may be useful for the elaboration of complex intervention reporting guidelines, improved reporting in future clinical pathway publications, and improved knowledge translation and exchange of clinical pathway interventions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038354794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2053434517732507

DO - 10.1177/2053434517732507

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 148

EP - 161

JO - International Journal of Care Pathways

JF - International Journal of Care Pathways

SN - 2040-4026

IS - 4

ER -