Are corporate governance recommendations relevant for small companies?

Jacqueline Christensen, Pamela Kent, James Routledge, Jenny Stewart

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study examines the extent to which small listed companies in Australia comply with the Australian Securities Exchange corporate governance recommendations, and whether applying these recommendations is associated with benefits in terms of performance and accountability. The results indicate that many small listed companies comply with the recommendations, although the benefits to these companies from doing so appear to be low. We do not find evidence of a positive association between small company compliance with recommendations regarding board independence, diligence and formation of an audit committee and performance. However, we find that compliance with the recommendation against having a dual CEO/Chair structure is beneficial. The voluntary regulatory approach is likely to be disproportionately costly for small companies if as our findings suggest compliance has few benefits for small companies. This is an important issue because small companies represent a substantial proportion of all listed companies. The current study has international relevance because the problem of designing effective governance regulation for a broad range of companies is not unique to the Australian jurisdiction. The findings have worldwide implications for regulators because the implementation of governance recommendations is costly for small companies and many regulatory frameworks require companies to implement formal corporate governance mechanisms regardless of their size.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 1st Annual JIAR Conference
EditorsC.S. Agnes Cheng, X. Qu
Place of PublicationFlorida, USA
PublisherAmerican Accounting Association
Pages1-43
Number of pages43
Publication statusPublished - 2011
EventAnnual Journal of International Accounting Research (JIAR) Conference - Xiamen, Xiamen, China
Duration: 14 Jun 201717 Jun 2017
Conference number: 1st
http://aaahq.org/About (Link to Conference Organiser)

Conference

ConferenceAnnual Journal of International Accounting Research (JIAR) Conference
Abbreviated titleJIAR
CountryChina
CityXiamen
Period14/06/1717/06/17
Internet address

Fingerprint

Corporate governance
Small companies
Listed companies
Governance
Audit committee
Chief executive officer
Board independence
Regulatory framework
Proportion
Corporate governance mechanisms
Accountability
Jurisdiction

Cite this

Christensen, J., Kent, P., Routledge, J., & Stewart, J. (2011). Are corporate governance recommendations relevant for small companies? In C. S. Agnes Cheng, & X. Qu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Annual JIAR Conference (pp. 1-43). Florida, USA: American Accounting Association.
Christensen, Jacqueline ; Kent, Pamela ; Routledge, James ; Stewart, Jenny. / Are corporate governance recommendations relevant for small companies?. Proceedings of the 1st Annual JIAR Conference. editor / C.S. Agnes Cheng ; X. Qu. Florida, USA : American Accounting Association, 2011. pp. 1-43
@inproceedings{3a6bc942c73440c38b8d0400cb23eedd,
title = "Are corporate governance recommendations relevant for small companies?",
abstract = "This study examines the extent to which small listed companies in Australia comply with the Australian Securities Exchange corporate governance recommendations, and whether applying these recommendations is associated with benefits in terms of performance and accountability. The results indicate that many small listed companies comply with the recommendations, although the benefits to these companies from doing so appear to be low. We do not find evidence of a positive association between small company compliance with recommendations regarding board independence, diligence and formation of an audit committee and performance. However, we find that compliance with the recommendation against having a dual CEO/Chair structure is beneficial. The voluntary regulatory approach is likely to be disproportionately costly for small companies if as our findings suggest compliance has few benefits for small companies. This is an important issue because small companies represent a substantial proportion of all listed companies. The current study has international relevance because the problem of designing effective governance regulation for a broad range of companies is not unique to the Australian jurisdiction. The findings have worldwide implications for regulators because the implementation of governance recommendations is costly for small companies and many regulatory frameworks require companies to implement formal corporate governance mechanisms regardless of their size.",
author = "Jacqueline Christensen and Pamela Kent and James Routledge and Jenny Stewart",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
pages = "1--43",
editor = "{Agnes Cheng}, C.S. and X. Qu",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 1st Annual JIAR Conference",
publisher = "American Accounting Association",
address = "United States",

}

Christensen, J, Kent, P, Routledge, J & Stewart, J 2011, Are corporate governance recommendations relevant for small companies? in CS Agnes Cheng & X Qu (eds), Proceedings of the 1st Annual JIAR Conference. American Accounting Association, Florida, USA, pp. 1-43, Annual Journal of International Accounting Research (JIAR) Conference, Xiamen, China, 14/06/17.

Are corporate governance recommendations relevant for small companies? / Christensen, Jacqueline; Kent, Pamela; Routledge, James; Stewart, Jenny.

Proceedings of the 1st Annual JIAR Conference. ed. / C.S. Agnes Cheng; X. Qu. Florida, USA : American Accounting Association, 2011. p. 1-43.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Are corporate governance recommendations relevant for small companies?

AU - Christensen, Jacqueline

AU - Kent, Pamela

AU - Routledge, James

AU - Stewart, Jenny

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This study examines the extent to which small listed companies in Australia comply with the Australian Securities Exchange corporate governance recommendations, and whether applying these recommendations is associated with benefits in terms of performance and accountability. The results indicate that many small listed companies comply with the recommendations, although the benefits to these companies from doing so appear to be low. We do not find evidence of a positive association between small company compliance with recommendations regarding board independence, diligence and formation of an audit committee and performance. However, we find that compliance with the recommendation against having a dual CEO/Chair structure is beneficial. The voluntary regulatory approach is likely to be disproportionately costly for small companies if as our findings suggest compliance has few benefits for small companies. This is an important issue because small companies represent a substantial proportion of all listed companies. The current study has international relevance because the problem of designing effective governance regulation for a broad range of companies is not unique to the Australian jurisdiction. The findings have worldwide implications for regulators because the implementation of governance recommendations is costly for small companies and many regulatory frameworks require companies to implement formal corporate governance mechanisms regardless of their size.

AB - This study examines the extent to which small listed companies in Australia comply with the Australian Securities Exchange corporate governance recommendations, and whether applying these recommendations is associated with benefits in terms of performance and accountability. The results indicate that many small listed companies comply with the recommendations, although the benefits to these companies from doing so appear to be low. We do not find evidence of a positive association between small company compliance with recommendations regarding board independence, diligence and formation of an audit committee and performance. However, we find that compliance with the recommendation against having a dual CEO/Chair structure is beneficial. The voluntary regulatory approach is likely to be disproportionately costly for small companies if as our findings suggest compliance has few benefits for small companies. This is an important issue because small companies represent a substantial proportion of all listed companies. The current study has international relevance because the problem of designing effective governance regulation for a broad range of companies is not unique to the Australian jurisdiction. The findings have worldwide implications for regulators because the implementation of governance recommendations is costly for small companies and many regulatory frameworks require companies to implement formal corporate governance mechanisms regardless of their size.

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 1

EP - 43

BT - Proceedings of the 1st Annual JIAR Conference

A2 - Agnes Cheng, C.S.

A2 - Qu, X.

PB - American Accounting Association

CY - Florida, USA

ER -

Christensen J, Kent P, Routledge J, Stewart J. Are corporate governance recommendations relevant for small companies? In Agnes Cheng CS, Qu X, editors, Proceedings of the 1st Annual JIAR Conference. Florida, USA: American Accounting Association. 2011. p. 1-43