ARB-MED-ARB (And MSAs): A whole which is less than, not greater than, the sum of its parts?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Mediation affords parties to international commercial disputes
an opportunity to settle their differences in an informal and nonadversarial
setting and on mutually acceptable terms. Nonetheless
parties may be reluctant to use mediation because agreements
arrived at in mediation (mediated settlement agreements or MSAs)
are not widely or unformly enforceable. In an attempt to overcome
this problem, parties who wish to mediate may agree to participate in
a process known as arb-med-arb. This process, which is formed by
amalgamating elements of mediation and arbitration, may enable
parties to take advantage of various systems of arbitration rules
which allow a settlement reached during arbitration to be recorded
and enforced as a consent award. According to some commentators,
"hybridization" enables the parties to have "the best of both worlds".
In fact, the parties may sacrifice key features of arbitration and
mediation such that the procedural integrity of both processes is
compromised. This article explores the strengths and weaknesses of a
number of hybrid dispute resolution processes with a focus on arbmed-
arb and its foundational process, meb-arb. It considers whether
parties are getting less than, not more than, the sum of its parts,
when they resort to arb-med-arb for the purpose of enforcing MSAs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-274
Number of pages26
JournalContemporary Asia Arbitration Journal
Volume6
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

arbitration
mediation
integrity

Cite this

@article{2a5462f175884901988e6700552122ee,
title = "ARB-MED-ARB (And MSAs): A whole which is less than, not greater than, the sum of its parts?",
abstract = "Mediation affords parties to international commercial disputesan opportunity to settle their differences in an informal and nonadversarialsetting and on mutually acceptable terms. Nonethelessparties may be reluctant to use mediation because agreementsarrived at in mediation (mediated settlement agreements or MSAs)are not widely or unformly enforceable. In an attempt to overcomethis problem, parties who wish to mediate may agree to participate ina process known as arb-med-arb. This process, which is formed byamalgamating elements of mediation and arbitration, may enableparties to take advantage of various systems of arbitration ruleswhich allow a settlement reached during arbitration to be recordedand enforced as a consent award. According to some commentators,{"}hybridization{"} enables the parties to have {"}the best of both worlds{"}.In fact, the parties may sacrifice key features of arbitration andmediation such that the procedural integrity of both processes iscompromised. This article explores the strengths and weaknesses of anumber of hybrid dispute resolution processes with a focus on arbmed-arb and its foundational process, meb-arb. It considers whetherparties are getting less than, not more than, the sum of its parts,when they resort to arb-med-arb for the purpose of enforcing MSAs.",
author = "B Wolski",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "249--274",
journal = "Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal",
issn = "1999-9747",
publisher = "National Taiwan University (IEEB)",
number = "2",

}

ARB-MED-ARB (And MSAs) : A whole which is less than, not greater than, the sum of its parts? / Wolski, B.

In: Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2013, p. 249-274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - ARB-MED-ARB (And MSAs)

T2 - A whole which is less than, not greater than, the sum of its parts?

AU - Wolski, B

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Mediation affords parties to international commercial disputesan opportunity to settle their differences in an informal and nonadversarialsetting and on mutually acceptable terms. Nonethelessparties may be reluctant to use mediation because agreementsarrived at in mediation (mediated settlement agreements or MSAs)are not widely or unformly enforceable. In an attempt to overcomethis problem, parties who wish to mediate may agree to participate ina process known as arb-med-arb. This process, which is formed byamalgamating elements of mediation and arbitration, may enableparties to take advantage of various systems of arbitration ruleswhich allow a settlement reached during arbitration to be recordedand enforced as a consent award. According to some commentators,"hybridization" enables the parties to have "the best of both worlds".In fact, the parties may sacrifice key features of arbitration andmediation such that the procedural integrity of both processes iscompromised. This article explores the strengths and weaknesses of anumber of hybrid dispute resolution processes with a focus on arbmed-arb and its foundational process, meb-arb. It considers whetherparties are getting less than, not more than, the sum of its parts,when they resort to arb-med-arb for the purpose of enforcing MSAs.

AB - Mediation affords parties to international commercial disputesan opportunity to settle their differences in an informal and nonadversarialsetting and on mutually acceptable terms. Nonethelessparties may be reluctant to use mediation because agreementsarrived at in mediation (mediated settlement agreements or MSAs)are not widely or unformly enforceable. In an attempt to overcomethis problem, parties who wish to mediate may agree to participate ina process known as arb-med-arb. This process, which is formed byamalgamating elements of mediation and arbitration, may enableparties to take advantage of various systems of arbitration ruleswhich allow a settlement reached during arbitration to be recordedand enforced as a consent award. According to some commentators,"hybridization" enables the parties to have "the best of both worlds".In fact, the parties may sacrifice key features of arbitration andmediation such that the procedural integrity of both processes iscompromised. This article explores the strengths and weaknesses of anumber of hybrid dispute resolution processes with a focus on arbmed-arb and its foundational process, meb-arb. It considers whetherparties are getting less than, not more than, the sum of its parts,when they resort to arb-med-arb for the purpose of enforcing MSAs.

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 249

EP - 274

JO - Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal

JF - Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal

SN - 1999-9747

IS - 2

ER -