Appropriateness of acid-suppressing agents for stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-intensive care unit setting in Saudi Arabia

Ala Malhis, Alghamdi Taghreed, Reem Alfandi, Zahra AlHaj Issa, Hadeel Alanazi, Hend Alfintoukh, Jaffer Bin Baqar, Sheraz Ali*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective:
To investigate the appropriateness of acid-suppressive therapy (AST) for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in noncritically ill hospitalized patients.

Materials and Methods:
A prospective, observational study with 384 subjects was conducted between October and December 2017 in the emergency and internal medicine departments. The Herzig clinical risk scoring system and the guidelines of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines were used to assess risk factors and determine risk scores for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding.

Results:
The mean age of subjects was 51.9 ± 19.4 years, and 220 (57.3%) of them were males. Among the absolute risk factors, coagulopathy was observed in 2 (0.5%) patients, mechanical ventilation in 15 (3.9%), and a history of GI bleeding in 1 (0.3%). Of 384 patients with SUP, 370 (96.4%) had a clinical risk score ≤ 9 and 14 (3.6%) had a risk score between 10 and 12 for nosocomial GI bleeding. A statistically significant relationship was found between the risk factor indication and demographics.

Conclusion:
SUP is frequently administered to noncritically ill hospitalized patients lacking risk factors for GI bleeding. Proton pump inhibitors are the overwhelming first choice of AST among prescribers. Practitioners should follow international guidelines when prescribing ASTs outside the critical-care setting.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)96-101
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes

Cite this