Approaches to economic evaluations of stroke rehabilitation

Louise E. Craig, Olivia Wu, Julie Bernhardt, Peter Langhorne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many stroke rehabilitation services and interventions are complex in that they involve a number of components, interactions, and outcomes. Much of the onus of stroke care lies with rehabilitation services and because stroke rehabilitation is highly resource intensive, it is important for policy makers to consider the potential trade-offs between all relevant costs and benefits. The primary aim of this systematic review was to assess the methods used to conduct economic evaluations of stroke rehabilitation. Studies that compared two or more alternative stroke rehabilitation interventions or services with the costs and outcomes being examined for each alternative were included. EMBASE, MEDLINE In-Process, and National Health Service's Economic Evaluation Database were searched using search strategies. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised using a checklist for the conduct and reporting of economic evaluations. Twenty-one studies met the selection criteria. The economic evaluations in the majority of these studies were inadequate based on their ability to identify, measure, and value all resources and benefits pertinent to the complexity of stroke rehabilitation. This study highlights that complex interventions such as stroke rehabilitation have widespread effects, which may not be represented by the changes on a single outcome. This study recommends the adoption of a wider cost and benefit perspective in the economic evaluations of complex interventions. It supports a move away from conventional economic evaluation and decision making, based purely on cost-effectiveness, toward multicriteria decision analysis frameworks for complex interventions, where a broader range of criteria may be assessed by policy makers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-100
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Stroke
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cost-Benefit Analysis
Administrative Personnel
Stroke Rehabilitation
Aptitude
Decision Support Techniques
Health Services Research
National Health Programs
Checklist
MEDLINE
Patient Selection
Decision Making
Rehabilitation
Stroke
Databases
Costs and Cost Analysis

Cite this

Craig, Louise E. ; Wu, Olivia ; Bernhardt, Julie ; Langhorne, Peter. / Approaches to economic evaluations of stroke rehabilitation. In: International Journal of Stroke. 2014 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 88-100.
@article{4f52310c467d4466a748bbe363b69bcf,
title = "Approaches to economic evaluations of stroke rehabilitation",
abstract = "Many stroke rehabilitation services and interventions are complex in that they involve a number of components, interactions, and outcomes. Much of the onus of stroke care lies with rehabilitation services and because stroke rehabilitation is highly resource intensive, it is important for policy makers to consider the potential trade-offs between all relevant costs and benefits. The primary aim of this systematic review was to assess the methods used to conduct economic evaluations of stroke rehabilitation. Studies that compared two or more alternative stroke rehabilitation interventions or services with the costs and outcomes being examined for each alternative were included. EMBASE, MEDLINE In-Process, and National Health Service's Economic Evaluation Database were searched using search strategies. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised using a checklist for the conduct and reporting of economic evaluations. Twenty-one studies met the selection criteria. The economic evaluations in the majority of these studies were inadequate based on their ability to identify, measure, and value all resources and benefits pertinent to the complexity of stroke rehabilitation. This study highlights that complex interventions such as stroke rehabilitation have widespread effects, which may not be represented by the changes on a single outcome. This study recommends the adoption of a wider cost and benefit perspective in the economic evaluations of complex interventions. It supports a move away from conventional economic evaluation and decision making, based purely on cost-effectiveness, toward multicriteria decision analysis frameworks for complex interventions, where a broader range of criteria may be assessed by policy makers.",
author = "Craig, {Louise E.} and Olivia Wu and Julie Bernhardt and Peter Langhorne",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ijs.12041",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "88--100",
journal = "International Journal of Stroke",
issn = "1747-4930",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Craig, LE, Wu, O, Bernhardt, J & Langhorne, P 2014, 'Approaches to economic evaluations of stroke rehabilitation' International Journal of Stroke, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 88-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12041

Approaches to economic evaluations of stroke rehabilitation. / Craig, Louise E.; Wu, Olivia; Bernhardt, Julie; Langhorne, Peter.

In: International Journal of Stroke, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 88-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Approaches to economic evaluations of stroke rehabilitation

AU - Craig, Louise E.

AU - Wu, Olivia

AU - Bernhardt, Julie

AU - Langhorne, Peter

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Many stroke rehabilitation services and interventions are complex in that they involve a number of components, interactions, and outcomes. Much of the onus of stroke care lies with rehabilitation services and because stroke rehabilitation is highly resource intensive, it is important for policy makers to consider the potential trade-offs between all relevant costs and benefits. The primary aim of this systematic review was to assess the methods used to conduct economic evaluations of stroke rehabilitation. Studies that compared two or more alternative stroke rehabilitation interventions or services with the costs and outcomes being examined for each alternative were included. EMBASE, MEDLINE In-Process, and National Health Service's Economic Evaluation Database were searched using search strategies. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised using a checklist for the conduct and reporting of economic evaluations. Twenty-one studies met the selection criteria. The economic evaluations in the majority of these studies were inadequate based on their ability to identify, measure, and value all resources and benefits pertinent to the complexity of stroke rehabilitation. This study highlights that complex interventions such as stroke rehabilitation have widespread effects, which may not be represented by the changes on a single outcome. This study recommends the adoption of a wider cost and benefit perspective in the economic evaluations of complex interventions. It supports a move away from conventional economic evaluation and decision making, based purely on cost-effectiveness, toward multicriteria decision analysis frameworks for complex interventions, where a broader range of criteria may be assessed by policy makers.

AB - Many stroke rehabilitation services and interventions are complex in that they involve a number of components, interactions, and outcomes. Much of the onus of stroke care lies with rehabilitation services and because stroke rehabilitation is highly resource intensive, it is important for policy makers to consider the potential trade-offs between all relevant costs and benefits. The primary aim of this systematic review was to assess the methods used to conduct economic evaluations of stroke rehabilitation. Studies that compared two or more alternative stroke rehabilitation interventions or services with the costs and outcomes being examined for each alternative were included. EMBASE, MEDLINE In-Process, and National Health Service's Economic Evaluation Database were searched using search strategies. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised using a checklist for the conduct and reporting of economic evaluations. Twenty-one studies met the selection criteria. The economic evaluations in the majority of these studies were inadequate based on their ability to identify, measure, and value all resources and benefits pertinent to the complexity of stroke rehabilitation. This study highlights that complex interventions such as stroke rehabilitation have widespread effects, which may not be represented by the changes on a single outcome. This study recommends the adoption of a wider cost and benefit perspective in the economic evaluations of complex interventions. It supports a move away from conventional economic evaluation and decision making, based purely on cost-effectiveness, toward multicriteria decision analysis frameworks for complex interventions, where a broader range of criteria may be assessed by policy makers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890852195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ijs.12041

DO - 10.1111/ijs.12041

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 88

EP - 100

JO - International Journal of Stroke

JF - International Journal of Stroke

SN - 1747-4930

IS - 1

ER -