Abstract
Objective:
To describe the current practice of prophylactic antibiotic prescribing for patients presenting to the ED with a dog bite, and compare management against existing guidelines.
Methods:
We performed a descriptive retrospective study on all consecutive patients who presented to one tertiary teaching hospital and one regional district hospital in Southeast Queensland between 1 July 2017 and 30 June 2018 with a presentation of a dog bite. Data on demographics and management were collected from the electronic medical record using a standardised data collection tool. Risk factors supporting prophylaxis were taken from the electronic Therapeutic Guidelines.
Results:
Of the 336 patients included for analysis, 299 received antibiotics, of which 23 were for established infection. A total of 276 (82% of overall cohort) received a prescription for prophylactic antibiotics, either in hospital (ED or admitting ward) and/or on discharge. Of the 178 patients who received prophylactic antibiotics in hospital, 91 (51.1%) received intravenous antibiotics. Of the patients who presented to ED without a previously established infection 271 (86.6%) received prophylactic antibiotics on discharge. Over one quarter (27.5%) of patients who were given prophylactic antibiotics did not meet any high-risk factors as outlined in guidelines.
Conclusion:
Prophylactic antibiotics are extensively used for patients with dog bites. There is scope to rationalise antibiotic use and route of antibiotic administration in patients with dog bites.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 578-585 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 20 Jan 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2020 |