Anti-Discrimination Law as the Protector of Other Rights and Freedoms: The Case of the RDA

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The prohibitions on discrimination on the basis of race in the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) are different from those contained in other Commonwealth discrimination legislation. Rather than demonstrate ‘less favourable’ treatment on the basis of a ground, the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 requires complainants to demonstrate that an act or a law has made a distinction based on race that has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the enjoyment of a person’s human rights and fundamental freedoms. This article will argue that while this construction has avoided some of the problems that plague other Commonwealth discrimination laws, the focus on ‘other rights and freedoms’ in the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 gives rise to a different problem – an effective articulation of the content and scope of such other rights and freedoms. Such a problem could be resolved through refocusing attention of the underlying purpose of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 – the facilitation of equality and non-discrimination on the basis of race.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)405-430
Number of pages26
JournalAdelaide Law Review
Volume42
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anti-Discrimination Law as the Protector of Other Rights and Freedoms: The Case of the RDA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this