Anthropometric and fitness characteristics of elite australian female water polo players

F. H Y Tan, Ted Polglaze, Brian Dawson, Gregory Cox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the anthropometric and fitness characteristics of elite female water polo players and examine the differences between players of different competition levels (national and international) and playing positions (center and perimeter). Twenty-six female water polo players (National League, n =12, and National Squad, n =14) underwent measurements of standard anthropometry (height, body mass, and sum of 7 skinfolds), lower-body muscular power (in-water vertical jump), speed (10-m maximal sprint swim), and aerobic fitness (multistage shuttle swim test). No goalkeepers were involved. The National Squad players were taller (173.7± 5.5 vs. 169.6± 4.4 cm; p < 0.05) and heavier (74.6 ± 8.0 vs. 65.8 ± 8.4 kg; p < 0.05) and had better jumping (139.0 ± 7.0 vs. 129.7 ± 4.6 cm; p < 0.001), sprinting (5.96 6 0.21 vs. 6.26 ± 0.34 seconds; p < 0.05), and endurance swimming abilities (652 ± 84 vs. 449 ± 124 m; p < 0.001) compared with the National League players. Perimeter players had lower- body mass (70.2 ± 3.8 vs. 82.5 ± 7.4 kg; p < 0.001) and skinfold levels (88.7 ± 14.1 vs. 118.6 ± 22.2 mm; p < 0.01) and better sprinting (5.88 ± 0.19 vs. 6.10 ± 0.19 seconds; effect size [ES] = 1.16, p > 0.05) and endurance swimming abilities (678 ± 65 vs. 606 ± 102 m; ES = 0.84, p > 0.05) compared with center players. These findings demonstrate that anthropometric and fitness characteristics can discriminate between players of different competition levels and playing positions. These water polo-specific field tests may assist coaches in profiling players and evaluating adaptations to training.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1530-1536
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Water
Anthropometry
Body Height
flavodic acid
Mentoring

Cite this

@article{46f1d1841e0742ab9e3f3462889bd0ed,
title = "Anthropometric and fitness characteristics of elite australian female water polo players",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to investigate the anthropometric and fitness characteristics of elite female water polo players and examine the differences between players of different competition levels (national and international) and playing positions (center and perimeter). Twenty-six female water polo players (National League, n =12, and National Squad, n =14) underwent measurements of standard anthropometry (height, body mass, and sum of 7 skinfolds), lower-body muscular power (in-water vertical jump), speed (10-m maximal sprint swim), and aerobic fitness (multistage shuttle swim test). No goalkeepers were involved. The National Squad players were taller (173.7± 5.5 vs. 169.6± 4.4 cm; p < 0.05) and heavier (74.6 ± 8.0 vs. 65.8 ± 8.4 kg; p < 0.05) and had better jumping (139.0 ± 7.0 vs. 129.7 ± 4.6 cm; p < 0.001), sprinting (5.96 6 0.21 vs. 6.26 ± 0.34 seconds; p < 0.05), and endurance swimming abilities (652 ± 84 vs. 449 ± 124 m; p < 0.001) compared with the National League players. Perimeter players had lower- body mass (70.2 ± 3.8 vs. 82.5 ± 7.4 kg; p < 0.001) and skinfold levels (88.7 ± 14.1 vs. 118.6 ± 22.2 mm; p < 0.01) and better sprinting (5.88 ± 0.19 vs. 6.10 ± 0.19 seconds; effect size [ES] = 1.16, p > 0.05) and endurance swimming abilities (678 ± 65 vs. 606 ± 102 m; ES = 0.84, p > 0.05) compared with center players. These findings demonstrate that anthropometric and fitness characteristics can discriminate between players of different competition levels and playing positions. These water polo-specific field tests may assist coaches in profiling players and evaluating adaptations to training.",
author = "Tan, {F. H Y} and Ted Polglaze and Brian Dawson and Gregory Cox",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a39261",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1530--1536",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

Anthropometric and fitness characteristics of elite australian female water polo players. / Tan, F. H Y; Polglaze, Ted; Dawson, Brian; Cox, Gregory.

In: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, Vol. 23, No. 5, 01.08.2009, p. 1530-1536.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anthropometric and fitness characteristics of elite australian female water polo players

AU - Tan, F. H Y

AU - Polglaze, Ted

AU - Dawson, Brian

AU - Cox, Gregory

PY - 2009/8/1

Y1 - 2009/8/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to investigate the anthropometric and fitness characteristics of elite female water polo players and examine the differences between players of different competition levels (national and international) and playing positions (center and perimeter). Twenty-six female water polo players (National League, n =12, and National Squad, n =14) underwent measurements of standard anthropometry (height, body mass, and sum of 7 skinfolds), lower-body muscular power (in-water vertical jump), speed (10-m maximal sprint swim), and aerobic fitness (multistage shuttle swim test). No goalkeepers were involved. The National Squad players were taller (173.7± 5.5 vs. 169.6± 4.4 cm; p < 0.05) and heavier (74.6 ± 8.0 vs. 65.8 ± 8.4 kg; p < 0.05) and had better jumping (139.0 ± 7.0 vs. 129.7 ± 4.6 cm; p < 0.001), sprinting (5.96 6 0.21 vs. 6.26 ± 0.34 seconds; p < 0.05), and endurance swimming abilities (652 ± 84 vs. 449 ± 124 m; p < 0.001) compared with the National League players. Perimeter players had lower- body mass (70.2 ± 3.8 vs. 82.5 ± 7.4 kg; p < 0.001) and skinfold levels (88.7 ± 14.1 vs. 118.6 ± 22.2 mm; p < 0.01) and better sprinting (5.88 ± 0.19 vs. 6.10 ± 0.19 seconds; effect size [ES] = 1.16, p > 0.05) and endurance swimming abilities (678 ± 65 vs. 606 ± 102 m; ES = 0.84, p > 0.05) compared with center players. These findings demonstrate that anthropometric and fitness characteristics can discriminate between players of different competition levels and playing positions. These water polo-specific field tests may assist coaches in profiling players and evaluating adaptations to training.

AB - The purpose of this study was to investigate the anthropometric and fitness characteristics of elite female water polo players and examine the differences between players of different competition levels (national and international) and playing positions (center and perimeter). Twenty-six female water polo players (National League, n =12, and National Squad, n =14) underwent measurements of standard anthropometry (height, body mass, and sum of 7 skinfolds), lower-body muscular power (in-water vertical jump), speed (10-m maximal sprint swim), and aerobic fitness (multistage shuttle swim test). No goalkeepers were involved. The National Squad players were taller (173.7± 5.5 vs. 169.6± 4.4 cm; p < 0.05) and heavier (74.6 ± 8.0 vs. 65.8 ± 8.4 kg; p < 0.05) and had better jumping (139.0 ± 7.0 vs. 129.7 ± 4.6 cm; p < 0.001), sprinting (5.96 6 0.21 vs. 6.26 ± 0.34 seconds; p < 0.05), and endurance swimming abilities (652 ± 84 vs. 449 ± 124 m; p < 0.001) compared with the National League players. Perimeter players had lower- body mass (70.2 ± 3.8 vs. 82.5 ± 7.4 kg; p < 0.001) and skinfold levels (88.7 ± 14.1 vs. 118.6 ± 22.2 mm; p < 0.01) and better sprinting (5.88 ± 0.19 vs. 6.10 ± 0.19 seconds; effect size [ES] = 1.16, p > 0.05) and endurance swimming abilities (678 ± 65 vs. 606 ± 102 m; ES = 0.84, p > 0.05) compared with center players. These findings demonstrate that anthropometric and fitness characteristics can discriminate between players of different competition levels and playing positions. These water polo-specific field tests may assist coaches in profiling players and evaluating adaptations to training.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350734708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a39261

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a39261

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 1530

EP - 1536

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 5

ER -