Anaemia in patients undergoing major bowel surgery – Prevalence and current practice: A public and private institution experience

Edgar Poon*, David Pache, Alana Delaforce, Lemya Abdalla, Treasure McGuire

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aim: The study aimed to compare the frequency and alignment of preoperative anaemia screening and treatment with Australian guidelines in elective bowel surgery and determine the impact on clinical outcomes. 

Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study, with an audit of 559 adult patients who underwent major elective bowel surgery in an Australian metropolitan hospital, January 2016–December 2018. Outcome measures included rate of anaemia, guideline compliance, hospital length of stay, and transfusion rate. 

Results: Preoperative anaemia assessment occurred in 82.6% of patients. However, only 5.2% received recommended biochemical tests at least one week before surgery. Only 25.2% of anaemic patients received preoperative treatment; they experienced a longer hospital length of stay (9.93 days versus 7.88 days, p < 0.001) and an increased rate of transfusion (OR: 3.186, p < 0.05). 

Conclusion: The gaps between current preoperative anaemia screening, management and national guidelines may place patients at higher risk of poor surgical outcome.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Perioperative Practice
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 8 Jul 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Anaemia in patients undergoing major bowel surgery – Prevalence and current practice: A public and private institution experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this