An investigation of voluntary corporate greenhouse gas emissions reporting in a market governance system: Australian evidence

Michaela Rankin, Carolyn Windsor, Dina Wahyuni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

105 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Institutional governance theory is used to explain voluntary corporate greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting in the context of a market governance system in the absence of climate change public policy. This paper seeks to hypothesise that GHG reporting is related to internal organisation systems, external privately promulgated guidance and EU ETS trading. Design/methodology/approach: A two-stage approach is used. The initial model examines whether firms' GHG disclosures are associated with internal organisation systems factors: environmental management systems (EMS), corporate governance quality and environmental management committees as well as external private guidance provided by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) for 187 ASX 300 firms. EU ETS trading is also included. Determinants of the extent and credibility of GHG disclosure is examined in the second stage where an index constructed from the GHG reporting standard "ISO 14064-1" items for a sub-sample of 80 disclosing firms as the dependent variable. Findings: Firms that voluntarily disclose GHGs have EMSs (uncertified and certified), higher corporate governance quality and publicly report to the CDP, tend to be large and in the energy and mining and industrial sectors. The credibility and extent of disclosures are related to the existence of a certified EMS, public reporting to the CDP, and use of the GRI. Firms that disclose more credible information are more likely to be large and in the energy and mining, industrial and services sectors. Originality/value: The paper shows that some proactive but pragmatic Australian firms are disclosing their GHGs voluntarily for competitive advantage in the current market governance system in the absence of public policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1037-1070
Number of pages34
JournalAccounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal
Volume24
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011

Fingerprint

Market governance
Disclosure
Greenhouse gas emissions
Greenhouse gases
Carbon
Corporate governance
Industrial sector
Global Reporting Initiative
Energy
Environmental management system
Guidance
Credibility
Public policy
Internal organization
Quality management
Environmental management
Service sector
Design methodology
Climate change
Factors

Cite this

@article{3397ef4bbbfb46e4bb0cbf8339af99bd,
title = "An investigation of voluntary corporate greenhouse gas emissions reporting in a market governance system: Australian evidence",
abstract = "Purpose: Institutional governance theory is used to explain voluntary corporate greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting in the context of a market governance system in the absence of climate change public policy. This paper seeks to hypothesise that GHG reporting is related to internal organisation systems, external privately promulgated guidance and EU ETS trading. Design/methodology/approach: A two-stage approach is used. The initial model examines whether firms' GHG disclosures are associated with internal organisation systems factors: environmental management systems (EMS), corporate governance quality and environmental management committees as well as external private guidance provided by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) for 187 ASX 300 firms. EU ETS trading is also included. Determinants of the extent and credibility of GHG disclosure is examined in the second stage where an index constructed from the GHG reporting standard {"}ISO 14064-1{"} items for a sub-sample of 80 disclosing firms as the dependent variable. Findings: Firms that voluntarily disclose GHGs have EMSs (uncertified and certified), higher corporate governance quality and publicly report to the CDP, tend to be large and in the energy and mining and industrial sectors. The credibility and extent of disclosures are related to the existence of a certified EMS, public reporting to the CDP, and use of the GRI. Firms that disclose more credible information are more likely to be large and in the energy and mining, industrial and services sectors. Originality/value: The paper shows that some proactive but pragmatic Australian firms are disclosing their GHGs voluntarily for competitive advantage in the current market governance system in the absence of public policy.",
author = "Michaela Rankin and Carolyn Windsor and Dina Wahyuni",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1108/09513571111184751",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "1037--1070",
journal = "Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal",
issn = "0951-3574",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "8",

}

An investigation of voluntary corporate greenhouse gas emissions reporting in a market governance system : Australian evidence. / Rankin, Michaela; Windsor, Carolyn; Wahyuni, Dina.

In: Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 24, No. 8, 10.2011, p. 1037-1070.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An investigation of voluntary corporate greenhouse gas emissions reporting in a market governance system

T2 - Australian evidence

AU - Rankin, Michaela

AU - Windsor, Carolyn

AU - Wahyuni, Dina

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - Purpose: Institutional governance theory is used to explain voluntary corporate greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting in the context of a market governance system in the absence of climate change public policy. This paper seeks to hypothesise that GHG reporting is related to internal organisation systems, external privately promulgated guidance and EU ETS trading. Design/methodology/approach: A two-stage approach is used. The initial model examines whether firms' GHG disclosures are associated with internal organisation systems factors: environmental management systems (EMS), corporate governance quality and environmental management committees as well as external private guidance provided by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) for 187 ASX 300 firms. EU ETS trading is also included. Determinants of the extent and credibility of GHG disclosure is examined in the second stage where an index constructed from the GHG reporting standard "ISO 14064-1" items for a sub-sample of 80 disclosing firms as the dependent variable. Findings: Firms that voluntarily disclose GHGs have EMSs (uncertified and certified), higher corporate governance quality and publicly report to the CDP, tend to be large and in the energy and mining and industrial sectors. The credibility and extent of disclosures are related to the existence of a certified EMS, public reporting to the CDP, and use of the GRI. Firms that disclose more credible information are more likely to be large and in the energy and mining, industrial and services sectors. Originality/value: The paper shows that some proactive but pragmatic Australian firms are disclosing their GHGs voluntarily for competitive advantage in the current market governance system in the absence of public policy.

AB - Purpose: Institutional governance theory is used to explain voluntary corporate greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting in the context of a market governance system in the absence of climate change public policy. This paper seeks to hypothesise that GHG reporting is related to internal organisation systems, external privately promulgated guidance and EU ETS trading. Design/methodology/approach: A two-stage approach is used. The initial model examines whether firms' GHG disclosures are associated with internal organisation systems factors: environmental management systems (EMS), corporate governance quality and environmental management committees as well as external private guidance provided by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) for 187 ASX 300 firms. EU ETS trading is also included. Determinants of the extent and credibility of GHG disclosure is examined in the second stage where an index constructed from the GHG reporting standard "ISO 14064-1" items for a sub-sample of 80 disclosing firms as the dependent variable. Findings: Firms that voluntarily disclose GHGs have EMSs (uncertified and certified), higher corporate governance quality and publicly report to the CDP, tend to be large and in the energy and mining and industrial sectors. The credibility and extent of disclosures are related to the existence of a certified EMS, public reporting to the CDP, and use of the GRI. Firms that disclose more credible information are more likely to be large and in the energy and mining, industrial and services sectors. Originality/value: The paper shows that some proactive but pragmatic Australian firms are disclosing their GHGs voluntarily for competitive advantage in the current market governance system in the absence of public policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80055043618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/09513571111184751

DO - 10.1108/09513571111184751

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 1037

EP - 1070

JO - Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

JF - Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

SN - 0951-3574

IS - 8

ER -