An investigation of measurement error in visitor expenditure surveys

Mike Raybould, Liz Fredline

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether providing additional prompts in a visitor expenditure survey results in higher reported expenditure. Respondents to a self-completion survey of event visitors were randomly allocated either an aggregated or disaggregated expenditure format in a quasi-experimental design. ANOVA is used to identify significant differences in mean reported expenditure to the alternative formats. The research finds that provision of additional prompts in the expenditure module of a visitor survey results in higher reported expenditures in half the expenditure categories and, most importantly, in total expenditure. Collection of accurate visitor expenditure data is critical to estimation of the economic benefits of tourism and special events. Over or under estimation of direct expenditures associated with an event may have implications for future investment in the event by public and/or private agencies. Very few field tests of this fundamental issue in measurement error have been reported in the tourism literature. The few reported examples have tended to report results inconsistent with a priori expectations, although they have been based on very small sample size and therefore are limited by low power. This study is based on a large sample size and produces results consistent with a priori expectations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)201-211
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Event and Festival Management
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2012

Fingerprint

expenditure
tourism
Expenditure
Measurement error
experimental design
economics

Cite this

@article{1b2d1b1013ad492297d7f7b5b6c46434,
title = "An investigation of measurement error in visitor expenditure surveys",
abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether providing additional prompts in a visitor expenditure survey results in higher reported expenditure. Respondents to a self-completion survey of event visitors were randomly allocated either an aggregated or disaggregated expenditure format in a quasi-experimental design. ANOVA is used to identify significant differences in mean reported expenditure to the alternative formats. The research finds that provision of additional prompts in the expenditure module of a visitor survey results in higher reported expenditures in half the expenditure categories and, most importantly, in total expenditure. Collection of accurate visitor expenditure data is critical to estimation of the economic benefits of tourism and special events. Over or under estimation of direct expenditures associated with an event may have implications for future investment in the event by public and/or private agencies. Very few field tests of this fundamental issue in measurement error have been reported in the tourism literature. The few reported examples have tended to report results inconsistent with a priori expectations, although they have been based on very small sample size and therefore are limited by low power. This study is based on a large sample size and produces results consistent with a priori expectations.",
author = "Mike Raybould and Liz Fredline",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/17582951211229735",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "201--211",
journal = "International Journal of Event and Festival Management",
issn = "1758-2954",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

An investigation of measurement error in visitor expenditure surveys. / Raybould, Mike; Fredline, Liz.

In: International Journal of Event and Festival Management, Vol. 3, No. 2, 01.06.2012, p. 201-211.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An investigation of measurement error in visitor expenditure surveys

AU - Raybould, Mike

AU - Fredline, Liz

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether providing additional prompts in a visitor expenditure survey results in higher reported expenditure. Respondents to a self-completion survey of event visitors were randomly allocated either an aggregated or disaggregated expenditure format in a quasi-experimental design. ANOVA is used to identify significant differences in mean reported expenditure to the alternative formats. The research finds that provision of additional prompts in the expenditure module of a visitor survey results in higher reported expenditures in half the expenditure categories and, most importantly, in total expenditure. Collection of accurate visitor expenditure data is critical to estimation of the economic benefits of tourism and special events. Over or under estimation of direct expenditures associated with an event may have implications for future investment in the event by public and/or private agencies. Very few field tests of this fundamental issue in measurement error have been reported in the tourism literature. The few reported examples have tended to report results inconsistent with a priori expectations, although they have been based on very small sample size and therefore are limited by low power. This study is based on a large sample size and produces results consistent with a priori expectations.

AB - The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether providing additional prompts in a visitor expenditure survey results in higher reported expenditure. Respondents to a self-completion survey of event visitors were randomly allocated either an aggregated or disaggregated expenditure format in a quasi-experimental design. ANOVA is used to identify significant differences in mean reported expenditure to the alternative formats. The research finds that provision of additional prompts in the expenditure module of a visitor survey results in higher reported expenditures in half the expenditure categories and, most importantly, in total expenditure. Collection of accurate visitor expenditure data is critical to estimation of the economic benefits of tourism and special events. Over or under estimation of direct expenditures associated with an event may have implications for future investment in the event by public and/or private agencies. Very few field tests of this fundamental issue in measurement error have been reported in the tourism literature. The few reported examples have tended to report results inconsistent with a priori expectations, although they have been based on very small sample size and therefore are limited by low power. This study is based on a large sample size and produces results consistent with a priori expectations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986173200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/17582951211229735

DO - 10.1108/17582951211229735

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 201

EP - 211

JO - International Journal of Event and Festival Management

JF - International Journal of Event and Festival Management

SN - 1758-2954

IS - 2

ER -