An Evaluation of the Rules of Conduct Governing Legal Representatives in Mediation: Challenges for Rule Drafters and a Response to Jim Mason

Bobette Wolski

doi:10.5235/1460728X.1.1.182

An Evaluation of the Rules of Conduct Governing Legal Representatives in Mediation: Challenges for Rule Drafters and a Response to Jim Mason

Bobette Wolski

Faculty of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The article presents information on a comparative analysis of rules of professional conduct for legal representatives in the domain of mediation for countries including Australia, Great Britain, and the U.S. It focuses on duties of a lawyer irrespective of whether he or she is dealing with a third party, a court, or a client. It presents a response to professor Jim Mason's concept of incorporating a mediation code regarding non-adversarial behaviour, good faith participation, and honesty.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	182-215
Number of pages	34
Journal	Legal Ethics
Volume	16
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5235/1460728X.1.1.182
Publication status	Published - 1 Jul 2013

Access to Document

10.5235/1460728X.1.1.182

Cite this

@article{821497b457a24d3d81cbd60ad8b8783b,

title = "An Evaluation of the Rules of Conduct Governing Legal Representatives in Mediation: Challenges for Rule Drafters and a Response to Jim Mason",

abstract = "The article presents information on a comparative analysis of rules of professional conduct for legal representatives in the domain of mediation for countries including Australia, Great Britain, and the U.S. It focuses on duties of a lawyer irrespective of whether he or she is dealing with a third party, a court, or a client. It presents a response to professor Jim Mason's concept of incorporating a mediation code regarding non-adversarial behaviour, good faith participation, and honesty.",

author = "Bobette Wolski",

year = "2013",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.5235/1460728X.1.1.182",

language = "English",

volume = "16",

pages = "182--215",

journal = "Legal Ethics",

issn = "1460-728X",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Evaluation of the Rules of Conduct Governing Legal Representatives in Mediation

T2 - Challenges for Rule Drafters and a Response to Jim Mason

AU - Wolski, Bobette

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - The article presents information on a comparative analysis of rules of professional conduct for legal representatives in the domain of mediation for countries including Australia, Great Britain, and the U.S. It focuses on duties of a lawyer irrespective of whether he or she is dealing with a third party, a court, or a client. It presents a response to professor Jim Mason's concept of incorporating a mediation code regarding non-adversarial behaviour, good faith participation, and honesty.

AB - The article presents information on a comparative analysis of rules of professional conduct for legal representatives in the domain of mediation for countries including Australia, Great Britain, and the U.S. It focuses on duties of a lawyer irrespective of whether he or she is dealing with a third party, a court, or a client. It presents a response to professor Jim Mason's concept of incorporating a mediation code regarding non-adversarial behaviour, good faith participation, and honesty.

U2 - 10.5235/1460728X.1.1.182

DO - 10.5235/1460728X.1.1.182

M3 - Article

SN - 1460-728X

VL - 16

SP - 182

EP - 215

JO - Legal Ethics

JF - Legal Ethics

IS - 1

ER -

An Evaluation of the Rules of Conduct Governing Legal Representatives in Mediation: Challenges for Rule Drafters and a Response to Jim Mason

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this