An Evaluation of the Rules of Conduct Governing Legal Representatives in Mediation: Challenges for Rule Drafters and a Response to Jim Mason

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The article presents information on a comparative analysis of rules of professional conduct for legal representatives in the domain of mediation for countries including Australia, Great Britain, and the U.S. It focuses on duties of a lawyer irrespective of whether he or she is dealing with a third party, a court, or a client. It presents a response to professor Jim Mason's concept of incorporating a mediation code regarding non-adversarial behaviour, good faith participation, and honesty.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)182-215
Number of pages34
JournalLegal Ethics
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2013

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An Evaluation of the Rules of Conduct Governing Legal Representatives in Mediation: Challenges for Rule Drafters and a Response to Jim Mason'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this