An Evaluation of the Rules of Conduct Governing Legal Representatives in Mediation: Challenges for Rule Drafters and a Response to Jim Mason

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The article presents information on a comparative analysis of rules of professional conduct for legal representatives in the domain of mediation for countries including Australia, Great Britain, and the U.S. It focuses on duties of a lawyer irrespective of whether he or she is dealing with a third party, a court, or a client. It presents a response to professor Jim Mason's concept of incorporating a mediation code regarding non-adversarial behaviour, good faith participation, and honesty.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)182-215
Number of pages34
JournalLegal Ethics
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2013

Fingerprint

mediation
evaluation
lawyer
faith
university teacher
participation

Cite this

@article{821497b457a24d3d81cbd60ad8b8783b,
title = "An Evaluation of the Rules of Conduct Governing Legal Representatives in Mediation: Challenges for Rule Drafters and a Response to Jim Mason",
abstract = "The article presents information on a comparative analysis of rules of professional conduct for legal representatives in the domain of mediation for countries including Australia, Great Britain, and the U.S. It focuses on duties of a lawyer irrespective of whether he or she is dealing with a third party, a court, or a client. It presents a response to professor Jim Mason's concept of incorporating a mediation code regarding non-adversarial behaviour, good faith participation, and honesty.",
author = "Bobette Wolski",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5235/1460728X.1.1.182",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "182--215",
journal = "Legal Ethics",
issn = "1460-728X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

An Evaluation of the Rules of Conduct Governing Legal Representatives in Mediation : Challenges for Rule Drafters and a Response to Jim Mason. / Wolski, Bobette.

In: Legal Ethics, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.07.2013, p. 182-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Evaluation of the Rules of Conduct Governing Legal Representatives in Mediation

T2 - Challenges for Rule Drafters and a Response to Jim Mason

AU - Wolski, Bobette

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - The article presents information on a comparative analysis of rules of professional conduct for legal representatives in the domain of mediation for countries including Australia, Great Britain, and the U.S. It focuses on duties of a lawyer irrespective of whether he or she is dealing with a third party, a court, or a client. It presents a response to professor Jim Mason's concept of incorporating a mediation code regarding non-adversarial behaviour, good faith participation, and honesty.

AB - The article presents information on a comparative analysis of rules of professional conduct for legal representatives in the domain of mediation for countries including Australia, Great Britain, and the U.S. It focuses on duties of a lawyer irrespective of whether he or she is dealing with a third party, a court, or a client. It presents a response to professor Jim Mason's concept of incorporating a mediation code regarding non-adversarial behaviour, good faith participation, and honesty.

U2 - 10.5235/1460728X.1.1.182

DO - 10.5235/1460728X.1.1.182

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 182

EP - 215

JO - Legal Ethics

JF - Legal Ethics

SN - 1460-728X

IS - 1

ER -