An evaluation of parent-child interaction therapy with and without motivational enhancement to reduce attrition

Haley J Webb, Rae Thomas, Leanne McGregor, Elbina Avdagic, Melanie J Zimmer-Gembeck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although many interventions for child externalizing behavior report promising outcomes for families, high attrition prior to program completion remains a problem. Many programs report dropout rates of 50% or higher. In this trial we sought to reduce attrition and improve outcomes by augmenting a well-known evidence-based intervention, Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT), with a 3-session individual motivational enhancement component. Participants were 192 Australian caregivers (91.7% female; Mage = 34.4 years) and their children (33.3% female; Mage = 4.4 years). Families (51% referred from child welfare or health services for risk of maltreatment) were assigned to PCIT or a supported waitlist, with families assigned to PCIT receiving either standard PCIT (S/PCIT) or motivation-enhanced PCIT (M/PCIT), depending on their time of entry to the study. Waitlist families received phone calls every week for 12 weeks. Parents in M/PCIT reported more readiness to change their behavior from preassessment to after the motivation sessions. Also, parents who reported high, rather than low, motivation at preassessment did have a lower attrition rate, and there was some evidence that enhancing motivation was protective of premature attrition to the extent that caregivers achieved a high degree of change in motivation. Yet comparison of attrition rates and survival analyses revealed no difference between M/PCIT and S/PCIT in retention rate. Finally, there were greater reductions in externalizing and internalizing child behavior problems and parental stress among families in S/PCIT and M/PCIT compared with waitlist, and there was generally no significant difference between the two treatment conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)537-550
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Motivation
Child Behavior
Therapeutics
Caregivers
Parents
Survival Analysis
Child Welfare
Health Services

Cite this

Webb, Haley J ; Thomas, Rae ; McGregor, Leanne ; Avdagic, Elbina ; Zimmer-Gembeck, Melanie J. / An evaluation of parent-child interaction therapy with and without motivational enhancement to reduce attrition. In: Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 2017 ; Vol. 46, No. 4. pp. 537-550.
@article{539831d150964e8caf2dd34fe46f1be2,
title = "An evaluation of parent-child interaction therapy with and without motivational enhancement to reduce attrition",
abstract = "Although many interventions for child externalizing behavior report promising outcomes for families, high attrition prior to program completion remains a problem. Many programs report dropout rates of 50{\%} or higher. In this trial we sought to reduce attrition and improve outcomes by augmenting a well-known evidence-based intervention, Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT), with a 3-session individual motivational enhancement component. Participants were 192 Australian caregivers (91.7{\%} female; Mage = 34.4 years) and their children (33.3{\%} female; Mage = 4.4 years). Families (51{\%} referred from child welfare or health services for risk of maltreatment) were assigned to PCIT or a supported waitlist, with families assigned to PCIT receiving either standard PCIT (S/PCIT) or motivation-enhanced PCIT (M/PCIT), depending on their time of entry to the study. Waitlist families received phone calls every week for 12 weeks. Parents in M/PCIT reported more readiness to change their behavior from preassessment to after the motivation sessions. Also, parents who reported high, rather than low, motivation at preassessment did have a lower attrition rate, and there was some evidence that enhancing motivation was protective of premature attrition to the extent that caregivers achieved a high degree of change in motivation. Yet comparison of attrition rates and survival analyses revealed no difference between M/PCIT and S/PCIT in retention rate. Finally, there were greater reductions in externalizing and internalizing child behavior problems and parental stress among families in S/PCIT and M/PCIT compared with waitlist, and there was generally no significant difference between the two treatment conditions.",
author = "Webb, {Haley J} and Rae Thomas and Leanne McGregor and Elbina Avdagic and Zimmer-Gembeck, {Melanie J}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/15374416.2016.1247357",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "537--550",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology",
issn = "0047-228X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

An evaluation of parent-child interaction therapy with and without motivational enhancement to reduce attrition. / Webb, Haley J; Thomas, Rae; McGregor, Leanne; Avdagic, Elbina; Zimmer-Gembeck, Melanie J.

In: Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Vol. 46, No. 4, 04.07.2017, p. 537-550.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of parent-child interaction therapy with and without motivational enhancement to reduce attrition

AU - Webb, Haley J

AU - Thomas, Rae

AU - McGregor, Leanne

AU - Avdagic, Elbina

AU - Zimmer-Gembeck, Melanie J

PY - 2017/7/4

Y1 - 2017/7/4

N2 - Although many interventions for child externalizing behavior report promising outcomes for families, high attrition prior to program completion remains a problem. Many programs report dropout rates of 50% or higher. In this trial we sought to reduce attrition and improve outcomes by augmenting a well-known evidence-based intervention, Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT), with a 3-session individual motivational enhancement component. Participants were 192 Australian caregivers (91.7% female; Mage = 34.4 years) and their children (33.3% female; Mage = 4.4 years). Families (51% referred from child welfare or health services for risk of maltreatment) were assigned to PCIT or a supported waitlist, with families assigned to PCIT receiving either standard PCIT (S/PCIT) or motivation-enhanced PCIT (M/PCIT), depending on their time of entry to the study. Waitlist families received phone calls every week for 12 weeks. Parents in M/PCIT reported more readiness to change their behavior from preassessment to after the motivation sessions. Also, parents who reported high, rather than low, motivation at preassessment did have a lower attrition rate, and there was some evidence that enhancing motivation was protective of premature attrition to the extent that caregivers achieved a high degree of change in motivation. Yet comparison of attrition rates and survival analyses revealed no difference between M/PCIT and S/PCIT in retention rate. Finally, there were greater reductions in externalizing and internalizing child behavior problems and parental stress among families in S/PCIT and M/PCIT compared with waitlist, and there was generally no significant difference between the two treatment conditions.

AB - Although many interventions for child externalizing behavior report promising outcomes for families, high attrition prior to program completion remains a problem. Many programs report dropout rates of 50% or higher. In this trial we sought to reduce attrition and improve outcomes by augmenting a well-known evidence-based intervention, Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT), with a 3-session individual motivational enhancement component. Participants were 192 Australian caregivers (91.7% female; Mage = 34.4 years) and their children (33.3% female; Mage = 4.4 years). Families (51% referred from child welfare or health services for risk of maltreatment) were assigned to PCIT or a supported waitlist, with families assigned to PCIT receiving either standard PCIT (S/PCIT) or motivation-enhanced PCIT (M/PCIT), depending on their time of entry to the study. Waitlist families received phone calls every week for 12 weeks. Parents in M/PCIT reported more readiness to change their behavior from preassessment to after the motivation sessions. Also, parents who reported high, rather than low, motivation at preassessment did have a lower attrition rate, and there was some evidence that enhancing motivation was protective of premature attrition to the extent that caregivers achieved a high degree of change in motivation. Yet comparison of attrition rates and survival analyses revealed no difference between M/PCIT and S/PCIT in retention rate. Finally, there were greater reductions in externalizing and internalizing child behavior problems and parental stress among families in S/PCIT and M/PCIT compared with waitlist, and there was generally no significant difference between the two treatment conditions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002323091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15374416.2016.1247357

DO - 10.1080/15374416.2016.1247357

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 537

EP - 550

JO - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

JF - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

SN - 0047-228X

IS - 4

ER -