An Empirical critique of "Interrogational" Torture

Richard Matthews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

[Extract] The current debates about the ethics of torture are replete with fictions and abstract generalizations. In this essay, I consider the category of “interrogational torture” and show how its use cannot withstand empirical scrutiny. Consequently,it is of no value in helping us ascertain the real-world possibilities and consequences of torture, nor can it help us assess whether state or non-state agents might be justified in using it. Interrogational torture, as Bob Brecher asserts, is a fantasy whose role in justifying torture is grotesque. In a discussion of the nature of explanation in history and the social sciences,Geoffrey Hawthorn warns of the dangers of abstraction and generalization.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)457-470
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Social Philosophy
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Torture
Grotesque
Social Sciences
Real World
Danger
Fiction
Scrutiny
History
Fantasy

Cite this

Matthews, Richard. / An Empirical critique of "Interrogational" Torture. In: Journal of Social Philosophy. 2012 ; Vol. 43, No. 4. pp. 457-470.
@article{5cefa16f5fe84dc8a17d6961406b1d34,
title = "An Empirical critique of {"}Interrogational{"} Torture",
abstract = "[Extract] The current debates about the ethics of torture are replete with fictions and abstract generalizations. In this essay, I consider the category of “interrogational torture” and show how its use cannot withstand empirical scrutiny. Consequently,it is of no value in helping us ascertain the real-world possibilities and consequences of torture, nor can it help us assess whether state or non-state agents might be justified in using it. Interrogational torture, as Bob Brecher asserts, is a fantasy whose role in justifying torture is grotesque. In a discussion of the nature of explanation in history and the social sciences,Geoffrey Hawthorn warns of the dangers of abstraction and generalization.",
author = "Richard Matthews",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/josp.12004",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "457--470",
journal = "Journal of Social Philosophy",
issn = "0047-2786",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

An Empirical critique of "Interrogational" Torture. / Matthews, Richard.

In: Journal of Social Philosophy, Vol. 43, No. 4, 01.12.2012, p. 457-470.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Empirical critique of "Interrogational" Torture

AU - Matthews, Richard

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - [Extract] The current debates about the ethics of torture are replete with fictions and abstract generalizations. In this essay, I consider the category of “interrogational torture” and show how its use cannot withstand empirical scrutiny. Consequently,it is of no value in helping us ascertain the real-world possibilities and consequences of torture, nor can it help us assess whether state or non-state agents might be justified in using it. Interrogational torture, as Bob Brecher asserts, is a fantasy whose role in justifying torture is grotesque. In a discussion of the nature of explanation in history and the social sciences,Geoffrey Hawthorn warns of the dangers of abstraction and generalization.

AB - [Extract] The current debates about the ethics of torture are replete with fictions and abstract generalizations. In this essay, I consider the category of “interrogational torture” and show how its use cannot withstand empirical scrutiny. Consequently,it is of no value in helping us ascertain the real-world possibilities and consequences of torture, nor can it help us assess whether state or non-state agents might be justified in using it. Interrogational torture, as Bob Brecher asserts, is a fantasy whose role in justifying torture is grotesque. In a discussion of the nature of explanation in history and the social sciences,Geoffrey Hawthorn warns of the dangers of abstraction and generalization.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871666193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/josp.12004

DO - 10.1111/josp.12004

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 457

EP - 470

JO - Journal of Social Philosophy

JF - Journal of Social Philosophy

SN - 0047-2786

IS - 4

ER -