An appraisal of healthcare accreditation agencies and programs: Similarities, differences, challenges and opportunities

David Greenfield; Usman Iqbal; Elaine O'Connor; Nicola Conlan; Heather Wilson

doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzab150

An appraisal of healthcare accreditation agencies and programs: Similarities, differences, challenges and opportunities

David Greenfield^*, Usman Iqbal, Elaine O'Connor, Nicola Conlan, Heather Wilson

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background:
The study, following similar reviews in 2000 and 2010, presents an update of knowledge about external evaluation agencies and accreditation programs.

Objective:
The study aim was to investigate the current profile of external evaluation agencies identifying their program features, and significant changes and challenges.

Original language	English
Article number	mzab150
Pages (from-to)	1-7
Number of pages	7
Journal	International Journal for Quality in Health Care
Volume	33
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzab150
Publication status	Published - 2021
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1093/intqhc/mzab150Licence: Free to read

Cite this

@article{ef84dd9f53e6493abf427eeb322463e8,

title = "An appraisal of healthcare accreditation agencies and programs: Similarities, differences, challenges and opportunities",

abstract = "Background:The study, following similar reviews in 2000 and 2010, presents an update of knowledge about external evaluation agencies and accreditation programs.Objective:The study aim was to investigate the current profile of external evaluation agencies identifying their program features, and significant changes and challenges.",

author = "David Greenfield and Usman Iqbal and Elaine O'Connor and Nicola Conlan and Heather Wilson",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.1093/intqhc/mzab150",

language = "English",

volume = "33",

pages = "1--7",

journal = "International Journal for Quality in Health Care",

issn = "1353-4505",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An appraisal of healthcare accreditation agencies and programs: Similarities, differences, challenges and opportunities

AU - Greenfield, David

AU - Iqbal, Usman

AU - O'Connor, Elaine

AU - Conlan, Nicola

AU - Wilson, Heather

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Background:The study, following similar reviews in 2000 and 2010, presents an update of knowledge about external evaluation agencies and accreditation programs.Objective:The study aim was to investigate the current profile of external evaluation agencies identifying their program features, and significant changes and challenges.

AB - Background:The study, following similar reviews in 2000 and 2010, presents an update of knowledge about external evaluation agencies and accreditation programs.Objective:The study aim was to investigate the current profile of external evaluation agencies identifying their program features, and significant changes and challenges.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119514782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/intqhc/mzab150

DO - 10.1093/intqhc/mzab150

M3 - Article

C2 - 34718602

AN - SCOPUS:85119514782

SN - 1353-4505

VL - 33

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

JF - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

IS - 4

M1 - mzab150

ER -

An appraisal of healthcare accreditation agencies and programs: Similarities, differences, challenges and opportunities

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this