Allied health research positions: A qualitative evaluation of their impact

Rachel J. Wenke, Elizabeth C. Ward, Ingrid Hickman, Julie Hulcombe, Rachel Phillips, Sharon Mickan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Research positions embedded within healthcare settings have been identified as an enabler to allied health professional (AHP) research capacity; however, there is currently limited research formally evaluating their impact. In 2008, a Health Practitioner industrial agreement funded a research capacity building initiative within Queensland Health, Australia, which included 15 new allied health research positions. The present project used a qualitative and realist approach to explore the impact of these research positions, as well as the mechanisms which facilitated or hindered their success within their respective organisations. Methods: Forty-four AHP employees from six governmental health services in Queensland, Australia, participated in the study. Individual interviews were undertaken, with individuals in research positions (n = 8) and their reporting line managers (n = 8). Four stakeholder focus groups were also conducted with clinicians, team leaders and professional heads who had engaged with the research positions. Results: Nine key outcomes of the research positions were identified across individual, team/service and organisational/community levels. These outcomes included clinician skill development, increased research activity, clinical and service changes, increased research outputs and collaborations, enhanced research and workplace culture, improved profile of allied health, development of research infrastructure, and professional development of individuals in the research positions. Different mechanisms that influenced these outcomes were identified. These mechanisms were grouped by those related to the (1) research position itself, (2) organisational factors and (3) implementation factors. Conclusions: The present findings highlight the potential value of the research positions for individuals, teams and clinical services across different governmental healthcare services, and demonstrate the impact of the roles on building the internal and external profile of allied health. Results build upon the emerging evidence base for allied health research positions and have important implications for a number of stakeholders (i.e. individuals in the research positions, AHPs and their managers, university partners and state-wide executives). Key recommendations are provided for all stakeholders to enhance the ongoing impact of these roles and the potential advocacy for additional positions and resources to support them.


This project was funded by Allied Health Profession’s Office of Queensland with support from Gold Coast Health.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6
JournalHealth Research Policy and Systems
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Feb 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health
Research
Allied Health Personnel
Queensland
Delivery of Health Care
Capacity Building
Ghana
Health Occupations
Occupational Health
Focus Groups
Workplace
Health Services
Head
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Organizations
Interviews

Cite this

Wenke, Rachel J. ; Ward, Elizabeth C. ; Hickman, Ingrid ; Hulcombe, Julie ; Phillips, Rachel ; Mickan, Sharon. / Allied health research positions : A qualitative evaluation of their impact. In: Health Research Policy and Systems. 2017 ; Vol. 15, No. 1.
@article{86ec24256d25496fa1a7b0dea6a5f0d7,
title = "Allied health research positions: A qualitative evaluation of their impact",
abstract = "Background: Research positions embedded within healthcare settings have been identified as an enabler to allied health professional (AHP) research capacity; however, there is currently limited research formally evaluating their impact. In 2008, a Health Practitioner industrial agreement funded a research capacity building initiative within Queensland Health, Australia, which included 15 new allied health research positions. The present project used a qualitative and realist approach to explore the impact of these research positions, as well as the mechanisms which facilitated or hindered their success within their respective organisations. Methods: Forty-four AHP employees from six governmental health services in Queensland, Australia, participated in the study. Individual interviews were undertaken, with individuals in research positions (n = 8) and their reporting line managers (n = 8). Four stakeholder focus groups were also conducted with clinicians, team leaders and professional heads who had engaged with the research positions. Results: Nine key outcomes of the research positions were identified across individual, team/service and organisational/community levels. These outcomes included clinician skill development, increased research activity, clinical and service changes, increased research outputs and collaborations, enhanced research and workplace culture, improved profile of allied health, development of research infrastructure, and professional development of individuals in the research positions. Different mechanisms that influenced these outcomes were identified. These mechanisms were grouped by those related to the (1) research position itself, (2) organisational factors and (3) implementation factors. Conclusions: The present findings highlight the potential value of the research positions for individuals, teams and clinical services across different governmental healthcare services, and demonstrate the impact of the roles on building the internal and external profile of allied health. Results build upon the emerging evidence base for allied health research positions and have important implications for a number of stakeholders (i.e. individuals in the research positions, AHPs and their managers, university partners and state-wide executives). Key recommendations are provided for all stakeholders to enhance the ongoing impact of these roles and the potential advocacy for additional positions and resources to support them.This project was funded by Allied Health Profession’s Office of Queensland with support from Gold Coast Health.",
author = "Wenke, {Rachel J.} and Ward, {Elizabeth C.} and Ingrid Hickman and Julie Hulcombe and Rachel Phillips and Sharon Mickan",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1186/s12961-016-0166-4",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "Health Research Policy and Systems",
issn = "1478-4505",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

Allied health research positions : A qualitative evaluation of their impact. / Wenke, Rachel J.; Ward, Elizabeth C.; Hickman, Ingrid; Hulcombe, Julie; Phillips, Rachel; Mickan, Sharon.

In: Health Research Policy and Systems, Vol. 15, No. 1, 6, 06.02.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Allied health research positions

T2 - A qualitative evaluation of their impact

AU - Wenke, Rachel J.

AU - Ward, Elizabeth C.

AU - Hickman, Ingrid

AU - Hulcombe, Julie

AU - Phillips, Rachel

AU - Mickan, Sharon

PY - 2017/2/6

Y1 - 2017/2/6

N2 - Background: Research positions embedded within healthcare settings have been identified as an enabler to allied health professional (AHP) research capacity; however, there is currently limited research formally evaluating their impact. In 2008, a Health Practitioner industrial agreement funded a research capacity building initiative within Queensland Health, Australia, which included 15 new allied health research positions. The present project used a qualitative and realist approach to explore the impact of these research positions, as well as the mechanisms which facilitated or hindered their success within their respective organisations. Methods: Forty-four AHP employees from six governmental health services in Queensland, Australia, participated in the study. Individual interviews were undertaken, with individuals in research positions (n = 8) and their reporting line managers (n = 8). Four stakeholder focus groups were also conducted with clinicians, team leaders and professional heads who had engaged with the research positions. Results: Nine key outcomes of the research positions were identified across individual, team/service and organisational/community levels. These outcomes included clinician skill development, increased research activity, clinical and service changes, increased research outputs and collaborations, enhanced research and workplace culture, improved profile of allied health, development of research infrastructure, and professional development of individuals in the research positions. Different mechanisms that influenced these outcomes were identified. These mechanisms were grouped by those related to the (1) research position itself, (2) organisational factors and (3) implementation factors. Conclusions: The present findings highlight the potential value of the research positions for individuals, teams and clinical services across different governmental healthcare services, and demonstrate the impact of the roles on building the internal and external profile of allied health. Results build upon the emerging evidence base for allied health research positions and have important implications for a number of stakeholders (i.e. individuals in the research positions, AHPs and their managers, university partners and state-wide executives). Key recommendations are provided for all stakeholders to enhance the ongoing impact of these roles and the potential advocacy for additional positions and resources to support them.This project was funded by Allied Health Profession’s Office of Queensland with support from Gold Coast Health.

AB - Background: Research positions embedded within healthcare settings have been identified as an enabler to allied health professional (AHP) research capacity; however, there is currently limited research formally evaluating their impact. In 2008, a Health Practitioner industrial agreement funded a research capacity building initiative within Queensland Health, Australia, which included 15 new allied health research positions. The present project used a qualitative and realist approach to explore the impact of these research positions, as well as the mechanisms which facilitated or hindered their success within their respective organisations. Methods: Forty-four AHP employees from six governmental health services in Queensland, Australia, participated in the study. Individual interviews were undertaken, with individuals in research positions (n = 8) and their reporting line managers (n = 8). Four stakeholder focus groups were also conducted with clinicians, team leaders and professional heads who had engaged with the research positions. Results: Nine key outcomes of the research positions were identified across individual, team/service and organisational/community levels. These outcomes included clinician skill development, increased research activity, clinical and service changes, increased research outputs and collaborations, enhanced research and workplace culture, improved profile of allied health, development of research infrastructure, and professional development of individuals in the research positions. Different mechanisms that influenced these outcomes were identified. These mechanisms were grouped by those related to the (1) research position itself, (2) organisational factors and (3) implementation factors. Conclusions: The present findings highlight the potential value of the research positions for individuals, teams and clinical services across different governmental healthcare services, and demonstrate the impact of the roles on building the internal and external profile of allied health. Results build upon the emerging evidence base for allied health research positions and have important implications for a number of stakeholders (i.e. individuals in the research positions, AHPs and their managers, university partners and state-wide executives). Key recommendations are provided for all stakeholders to enhance the ongoing impact of these roles and the potential advocacy for additional positions and resources to support them.This project was funded by Allied Health Profession’s Office of Queensland with support from Gold Coast Health.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011709939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12961-016-0166-4

DO - 10.1186/s12961-016-0166-4

M3 - Article

VL - 15

JO - Health Research Policy and Systems

JF - Health Research Policy and Systems

SN - 1478-4505

IS - 1

M1 - 6

ER -