Aligning Pathology Assessment in a Learner-Centered Undergraduate Medical Curriculum

Neelam Doshi, Carmel Tepper (Group Author), Robert Gordon Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

38 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: The Bond Medical Program delivers pathology in the preclinical years through interactive learning. Assessment for learning demands fit-for-purpose assessment that aligns with the curriculum. In Year 2 of the medical curriculum, clinical pathology is assessed through a series of written and an integrated practical assessment (IPA) examination. The IPA is a practical examination held in a laboratory which permits the use of multi-media. The traditional written paper examines the theoretical aspect of pathology while the IPA assesses the observational skill and three dimensional application of pathophysiology to disease processes. Objectives: To determine whether a difference exists in student performance on pathology questions between the IPA and a written examination. Methods: Year 2 undergraduate medical students write a 50-station IPA, followed by a 50-question written paper. A comparison of performance between the written assessment and the IPA is undertaken and correlated using Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: A positive Pearson’s correlation coefficient of percentage scores (r=0.68, significant at > 0.01) between the written and IPA suggests a strong association between the two assessment methods. Conclusion: Students’ scores in the IPA and the written assessment correlate well which suggest either could be used to predict students’ performance in pathology. The IPA enables students to connect the basic sciences with clinical sciences, thus aligning our learner centred pathology curriculum with the assessment tools. Keywords: Assessment; Clinico-pathological correlation; Integrated; Pathology; Performance
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages4
JournalBiomedical Journal of Scientific and Technical Research
Volume1
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Pathology
Students
Clinical Pathology
Medical Students
Learning

Cite this

@article{adbe0b6fb9e64a88bab66aa52050c688,
title = "Aligning Pathology Assessment in a Learner-Centered Undergraduate Medical Curriculum",
abstract = "Introduction: The Bond Medical Program delivers pathology in the preclinical years through interactive learning. Assessment for learning demands fit-for-purpose assessment that aligns with the curriculum. In Year 2 of the medical curriculum, clinical pathology is assessed through a series of written and an integrated practical assessment (IPA) examination. The IPA is a practical examination held in a laboratory which permits the use of multi-media. The traditional written paper examines the theoretical aspect of pathology while the IPA assesses the observational skill and three dimensional application of pathophysiology to disease processes. Objectives: To determine whether a difference exists in student performance on pathology questions between the IPA and a written examination. Methods: Year 2 undergraduate medical students write a 50-station IPA, followed by a 50-question written paper. A comparison of performance between the written assessment and the IPA is undertaken and correlated using Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: A positive Pearson’s correlation coefficient of percentage scores (r=0.68, significant at > 0.01) between the written and IPA suggests a strong association between the two assessment methods. Conclusion: Students’ scores in the IPA and the written assessment correlate well which suggest either could be used to predict students’ performance in pathology. The IPA enables students to connect the basic sciences with clinical sciences, thus aligning our learner centred pathology curriculum with the assessment tools. Keywords: Assessment; Clinico-pathological correlation; Integrated; Pathology; Performance",
author = "Neelam Doshi and Carmel Tepper and Wright, {Robert Gordon}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "12",
doi = "10.26717/BJSTR.2017.01.000435",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
journal = "Biomedical Journal of Scientific and Technical Research",
issn = "2574-1241",
number = "5",

}

Aligning Pathology Assessment in a Learner-Centered Undergraduate Medical Curriculum. / Doshi, Neelam; Tepper, Carmel (Group Author); Wright, Robert Gordon.

In: Biomedical Journal of Scientific and Technical Research, Vol. 1, No. 5, 12.10.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aligning Pathology Assessment in a Learner-Centered Undergraduate Medical Curriculum

AU - Doshi, Neelam

AU - Tepper, Carmel

AU - Wright, Robert Gordon

PY - 2017/10/12

Y1 - 2017/10/12

N2 - Introduction: The Bond Medical Program delivers pathology in the preclinical years through interactive learning. Assessment for learning demands fit-for-purpose assessment that aligns with the curriculum. In Year 2 of the medical curriculum, clinical pathology is assessed through a series of written and an integrated practical assessment (IPA) examination. The IPA is a practical examination held in a laboratory which permits the use of multi-media. The traditional written paper examines the theoretical aspect of pathology while the IPA assesses the observational skill and three dimensional application of pathophysiology to disease processes. Objectives: To determine whether a difference exists in student performance on pathology questions between the IPA and a written examination. Methods: Year 2 undergraduate medical students write a 50-station IPA, followed by a 50-question written paper. A comparison of performance between the written assessment and the IPA is undertaken and correlated using Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: A positive Pearson’s correlation coefficient of percentage scores (r=0.68, significant at > 0.01) between the written and IPA suggests a strong association between the two assessment methods. Conclusion: Students’ scores in the IPA and the written assessment correlate well which suggest either could be used to predict students’ performance in pathology. The IPA enables students to connect the basic sciences with clinical sciences, thus aligning our learner centred pathology curriculum with the assessment tools. Keywords: Assessment; Clinico-pathological correlation; Integrated; Pathology; Performance

AB - Introduction: The Bond Medical Program delivers pathology in the preclinical years through interactive learning. Assessment for learning demands fit-for-purpose assessment that aligns with the curriculum. In Year 2 of the medical curriculum, clinical pathology is assessed through a series of written and an integrated practical assessment (IPA) examination. The IPA is a practical examination held in a laboratory which permits the use of multi-media. The traditional written paper examines the theoretical aspect of pathology while the IPA assesses the observational skill and three dimensional application of pathophysiology to disease processes. Objectives: To determine whether a difference exists in student performance on pathology questions between the IPA and a written examination. Methods: Year 2 undergraduate medical students write a 50-station IPA, followed by a 50-question written paper. A comparison of performance between the written assessment and the IPA is undertaken and correlated using Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: A positive Pearson’s correlation coefficient of percentage scores (r=0.68, significant at > 0.01) between the written and IPA suggests a strong association between the two assessment methods. Conclusion: Students’ scores in the IPA and the written assessment correlate well which suggest either could be used to predict students’ performance in pathology. The IPA enables students to connect the basic sciences with clinical sciences, thus aligning our learner centred pathology curriculum with the assessment tools. Keywords: Assessment; Clinico-pathological correlation; Integrated; Pathology; Performance

U2 - 10.26717/BJSTR.2017.01.000435

DO - 10.26717/BJSTR.2017.01.000435

M3 - Article

VL - 1

JO - Biomedical Journal of Scientific and Technical Research

JF - Biomedical Journal of Scientific and Technical Research

SN - 2574-1241

IS - 5

ER -