Alcohol brands on Facebook: The challenges of regulating brands on social media

Sven Brodmerkel, Nicholas Carah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In September 2012, the Australian Advertising Standards Bureau (ASB) made 'landmark decisions' relating to the use of Facebook by vodka brand Smirnoff and beer brand Victoria Bitter. The ASB determined that (i) a brand's Facebook page is a marketing communication tool, and (ii) all contents on the page fall under the industry's self-regulatory code of ethics, including consumer-created content such as user-generated comments and photos. The decisions come in response to a submission that the authors made regarding the Facebook pages of the two brands. These submissions were based on a research project that had monitored the use of Facebook by several Australian alcohol brands since the late 2010 to identify how these brands use social media as experiential social spaces to engage consumers in the co-creation of content. This article reviews the ruling by analysing the advertisers' response to the complaint, the regulators' justifications for the decisions, and the possibilities and limitations of regulating social media in general. It argues that although the ASB has acknowledged that brands are responsible for all contents on their Facebook pages, the regulators' approach is of limited effectiveness given the way Facebook allows brands to embed themselves in the mediation of everyday life.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)272-281
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Public Affairs
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

facebook
social media
alcohol
social space
complaint
mediation
everyday life
research project
marketing
moral philosophy
industry
communication

Cite this

@article{741a78f048674925adf270daea5c173d,
title = "Alcohol brands on Facebook: The challenges of regulating brands on social media",
abstract = "In September 2012, the Australian Advertising Standards Bureau (ASB) made 'landmark decisions' relating to the use of Facebook by vodka brand Smirnoff and beer brand Victoria Bitter. The ASB determined that (i) a brand's Facebook page is a marketing communication tool, and (ii) all contents on the page fall under the industry's self-regulatory code of ethics, including consumer-created content such as user-generated comments and photos. The decisions come in response to a submission that the authors made regarding the Facebook pages of the two brands. These submissions were based on a research project that had monitored the use of Facebook by several Australian alcohol brands since the late 2010 to identify how these brands use social media as experiential social spaces to engage consumers in the co-creation of content. This article reviews the ruling by analysing the advertisers' response to the complaint, the regulators' justifications for the decisions, and the possibilities and limitations of regulating social media in general. It argues that although the ASB has acknowledged that brands are responsible for all contents on their Facebook pages, the regulators' approach is of limited effectiveness given the way Facebook allows brands to embed themselves in the mediation of everyday life.",
author = "Sven Brodmerkel and Nicholas Carah",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1002/pa.1466",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "272--281",
journal = "Journal of Public Affairs",
issn = "1472-3891",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "3",

}

Alcohol brands on Facebook : The challenges of regulating brands on social media. / Brodmerkel, Sven; Carah, Nicholas.

In: Journal of Public Affairs, Vol. 13, No. 3, 08.2013, p. 272-281.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alcohol brands on Facebook

T2 - The challenges of regulating brands on social media

AU - Brodmerkel, Sven

AU - Carah, Nicholas

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - In September 2012, the Australian Advertising Standards Bureau (ASB) made 'landmark decisions' relating to the use of Facebook by vodka brand Smirnoff and beer brand Victoria Bitter. The ASB determined that (i) a brand's Facebook page is a marketing communication tool, and (ii) all contents on the page fall under the industry's self-regulatory code of ethics, including consumer-created content such as user-generated comments and photos. The decisions come in response to a submission that the authors made regarding the Facebook pages of the two brands. These submissions were based on a research project that had monitored the use of Facebook by several Australian alcohol brands since the late 2010 to identify how these brands use social media as experiential social spaces to engage consumers in the co-creation of content. This article reviews the ruling by analysing the advertisers' response to the complaint, the regulators' justifications for the decisions, and the possibilities and limitations of regulating social media in general. It argues that although the ASB has acknowledged that brands are responsible for all contents on their Facebook pages, the regulators' approach is of limited effectiveness given the way Facebook allows brands to embed themselves in the mediation of everyday life.

AB - In September 2012, the Australian Advertising Standards Bureau (ASB) made 'landmark decisions' relating to the use of Facebook by vodka brand Smirnoff and beer brand Victoria Bitter. The ASB determined that (i) a brand's Facebook page is a marketing communication tool, and (ii) all contents on the page fall under the industry's self-regulatory code of ethics, including consumer-created content such as user-generated comments and photos. The decisions come in response to a submission that the authors made regarding the Facebook pages of the two brands. These submissions were based on a research project that had monitored the use of Facebook by several Australian alcohol brands since the late 2010 to identify how these brands use social media as experiential social spaces to engage consumers in the co-creation of content. This article reviews the ruling by analysing the advertisers' response to the complaint, the regulators' justifications for the decisions, and the possibilities and limitations of regulating social media in general. It argues that although the ASB has acknowledged that brands are responsible for all contents on their Facebook pages, the regulators' approach is of limited effectiveness given the way Facebook allows brands to embed themselves in the mediation of everyday life.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883743538&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pa.1466

DO - 10.1002/pa.1466

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 272

EP - 281

JO - Journal of Public Affairs

JF - Journal of Public Affairs

SN - 1472-3891

IS - 3

ER -