TY - JOUR
T1 - A survey of drug-dose calculation skills of Australian tertiary hospital doctors
AU - Simpson, Chanelle M.
AU - Keijzers, Gerben B.
AU - Lind, James F.
PY - 2009/2/2
Y1 - 2009/2/2
N2 - Objective: To assess the ability of doctors to calculate drug doses and their workplace prescribing and calculation habits. Design and setting: Prospective, questionnaire-based observational study conducted at a 570-bed teaching hospital in February 2007. Participants: Convenience sample of 190 doctors, representing all acute medical and surgical disciplines and diverse levels of experience. Main outcome measures: Demographic data, self-reported prescribing habits, predicted score on a 12-item test of ability to calculate drug doses, score considered adequate for peers, and actual score. Results: 141 doctors (74%) completed the questionnaire. The mean actual score on the test was 72.5% (95% Cl, 67.8%-77.3%), which was similar to the group's mean predicted score (74.7%; 95% Cl, 71.0%-78.5%) but significantly lower than the mean of the score they considered adequate (91.6%; 95% Cl, 89.5%-93.8%) (P<0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that senior doctors and those in critical care specialties (intensive care, emergency medicine and anaesthesia) achieved significantly higher actual scores than junior doctors and those in non-critical care specialties, respectively. Conclusions: Doctors expect their colleagues to perform significantly better in a drug-dose calculation test than they expect to, or can achieve, themselves. Junior staff and those in non-critical care specialties should be targeted for education in the skill of drug-dose calculation to reduce the risk of medication error and its consequences.
AB - Objective: To assess the ability of doctors to calculate drug doses and their workplace prescribing and calculation habits. Design and setting: Prospective, questionnaire-based observational study conducted at a 570-bed teaching hospital in February 2007. Participants: Convenience sample of 190 doctors, representing all acute medical and surgical disciplines and diverse levels of experience. Main outcome measures: Demographic data, self-reported prescribing habits, predicted score on a 12-item test of ability to calculate drug doses, score considered adequate for peers, and actual score. Results: 141 doctors (74%) completed the questionnaire. The mean actual score on the test was 72.5% (95% Cl, 67.8%-77.3%), which was similar to the group's mean predicted score (74.7%; 95% Cl, 71.0%-78.5%) but significantly lower than the mean of the score they considered adequate (91.6%; 95% Cl, 89.5%-93.8%) (P<0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that senior doctors and those in critical care specialties (intensive care, emergency medicine and anaesthesia) achieved significantly higher actual scores than junior doctors and those in non-critical care specialties, respectively. Conclusions: Doctors expect their colleagues to perform significantly better in a drug-dose calculation test than they expect to, or can achieve, themselves. Junior staff and those in non-critical care specialties should be targeted for education in the skill of drug-dose calculation to reduce the risk of medication error and its consequences.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61349104372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02308.x
DO - 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02308.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 19203306
AN - SCOPUS:61349104372
SN - 0025-729X
VL - 190
SP - 117
EP - 120
JO - Medical Journal of Australia
JF - Medical Journal of Australia
IS - 3
ER -