A randomised controlled trial comparing meat-based with human cadaveric models for teaching ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia

A. Chuan, Y. C. Lim, H. Aneja, N. A. Duce, R. Appleyard, K. Forrest, C. F. Royse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this prospective, blinded, randomised controlled study was to compare novices' acquisition of the technical skills of ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia using either a meat phantom model or fresh-frozen human cadavers. The primary outcome was the time taken to successfully perform an ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block on a cadaver; secondary outcomes were the cumulative score of errors, and best image quality of the sciatic nerve achieved. After training, the median (IQR [range]) time taken to perform the block was 311(164–390 [68–600]) s in the meat model trained group and 210 (174–354 [85–600]) s in the fresh-frozen cadaver trained group (p = 0.24). Participants made a median (IQR [range]) of 18 (14–33 [8–55]) and 15 (12–22 [8–44]) errors in the two groups respectively (p = 0.39). The image quality score was also not different, with a median (IQR [range]) of 62.5 (59.4–65.6 [25.0–100.0])% vs 62.5 (62.5–75.0 [25.0–87.5])% respectively (p = 0.58). The training and deliberate feedback improved all participants' block performance, the median (IQR [range]) times being 310 (206–532 [110–600]) s before and 240 (174–354 [85–600]) s after training (p = 0.02). We conclude that novices taught ultrasound scanning and needle guidance skills using an inexpensive and easily constructed meat model perform similarly to those trained on a cadaveric model.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)921-929
Number of pages9
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume71
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Conduction Anesthesia
Cadaver
Meat
Teaching
Randomized Controlled Trials
Sciatic Nerve
Nerve Block
Needles

Cite this

Chuan, A. ; Lim, Y. C. ; Aneja, H. ; Duce, N. A. ; Appleyard, R. ; Forrest, K. ; Royse, C. F. / A randomised controlled trial comparing meat-based with human cadaveric models for teaching ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. In: Anaesthesia. 2016 ; Vol. 71, No. 8. pp. 921-929.
@article{92fde83172714e26be52ea6a70ea2374,
title = "A randomised controlled trial comparing meat-based with human cadaveric models for teaching ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia",
abstract = "The aim of this prospective, blinded, randomised controlled study was to compare novices' acquisition of the technical skills of ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia using either a meat phantom model or fresh-frozen human cadavers. The primary outcome was the time taken to successfully perform an ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block on a cadaver; secondary outcomes were the cumulative score of errors, and best image quality of the sciatic nerve achieved. After training, the median (IQR [range]) time taken to perform the block was 311(164–390 [68–600]) s in the meat model trained group and 210 (174–354 [85–600]) s in the fresh-frozen cadaver trained group (p = 0.24). Participants made a median (IQR [range]) of 18 (14–33 [8–55]) and 15 (12–22 [8–44]) errors in the two groups respectively (p = 0.39). The image quality score was also not different, with a median (IQR [range]) of 62.5 (59.4–65.6 [25.0–100.0]){\%} vs 62.5 (62.5–75.0 [25.0–87.5]){\%} respectively (p = 0.58). The training and deliberate feedback improved all participants' block performance, the median (IQR [range]) times being 310 (206–532 [110–600]) s before and 240 (174–354 [85–600]) s after training (p = 0.02). We conclude that novices taught ultrasound scanning and needle guidance skills using an inexpensive and easily constructed meat model perform similarly to those trained on a cadaveric model.",
author = "A. Chuan and Lim, {Y. C.} and H. Aneja and Duce, {N. A.} and R. Appleyard and K. Forrest and Royse, {C. F.}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/anae.13446",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "921--929",
journal = "Anaesthesia",
issn = "0003-2409",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

A randomised controlled trial comparing meat-based with human cadaveric models for teaching ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia. / Chuan, A.; Lim, Y. C.; Aneja, H.; Duce, N. A.; Appleyard, R.; Forrest, K.; Royse, C. F.

In: Anaesthesia, Vol. 71, No. 8, 01.08.2016, p. 921-929.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomised controlled trial comparing meat-based with human cadaveric models for teaching ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia

AU - Chuan, A.

AU - Lim, Y. C.

AU - Aneja, H.

AU - Duce, N. A.

AU - Appleyard, R.

AU - Forrest, K.

AU - Royse, C. F.

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - The aim of this prospective, blinded, randomised controlled study was to compare novices' acquisition of the technical skills of ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia using either a meat phantom model or fresh-frozen human cadavers. The primary outcome was the time taken to successfully perform an ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block on a cadaver; secondary outcomes were the cumulative score of errors, and best image quality of the sciatic nerve achieved. After training, the median (IQR [range]) time taken to perform the block was 311(164–390 [68–600]) s in the meat model trained group and 210 (174–354 [85–600]) s in the fresh-frozen cadaver trained group (p = 0.24). Participants made a median (IQR [range]) of 18 (14–33 [8–55]) and 15 (12–22 [8–44]) errors in the two groups respectively (p = 0.39). The image quality score was also not different, with a median (IQR [range]) of 62.5 (59.4–65.6 [25.0–100.0])% vs 62.5 (62.5–75.0 [25.0–87.5])% respectively (p = 0.58). The training and deliberate feedback improved all participants' block performance, the median (IQR [range]) times being 310 (206–532 [110–600]) s before and 240 (174–354 [85–600]) s after training (p = 0.02). We conclude that novices taught ultrasound scanning and needle guidance skills using an inexpensive and easily constructed meat model perform similarly to those trained on a cadaveric model.

AB - The aim of this prospective, blinded, randomised controlled study was to compare novices' acquisition of the technical skills of ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia using either a meat phantom model or fresh-frozen human cadavers. The primary outcome was the time taken to successfully perform an ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block on a cadaver; secondary outcomes were the cumulative score of errors, and best image quality of the sciatic nerve achieved. After training, the median (IQR [range]) time taken to perform the block was 311(164–390 [68–600]) s in the meat model trained group and 210 (174–354 [85–600]) s in the fresh-frozen cadaver trained group (p = 0.24). Participants made a median (IQR [range]) of 18 (14–33 [8–55]) and 15 (12–22 [8–44]) errors in the two groups respectively (p = 0.39). The image quality score was also not different, with a median (IQR [range]) of 62.5 (59.4–65.6 [25.0–100.0])% vs 62.5 (62.5–75.0 [25.0–87.5])% respectively (p = 0.58). The training and deliberate feedback improved all participants' block performance, the median (IQR [range]) times being 310 (206–532 [110–600]) s before and 240 (174–354 [85–600]) s after training (p = 0.02). We conclude that novices taught ultrasound scanning and needle guidance skills using an inexpensive and easily constructed meat model perform similarly to those trained on a cadaveric model.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978166164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/anae.13446

DO - 10.1111/anae.13446

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 921

EP - 929

JO - Anaesthesia

JF - Anaesthesia

SN - 0003-2409

IS - 8

ER -