A new jurisprudential framework for jurisdiction: Beyond the Harvard Draft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Eighty years ago, in 1935, a major step was taken in international law; the Harvard Research Draft Convention on Jurisdiction with Respect to Crime (“Harvard Draft”) was published in the American Journal of International Law. The influence of the Harvard Draft has been nothing but phenomenal and must surely have exceeded the drafters’ wildest ambitions. Indeed, it is fair to say that the structure put forward in the Harvard Draft has represented public international law’s approach to jurisdiction ever since.

The most obvious reason the Harvard Draft has had such an enormous influence is of course found in the fact that it represents a sterling research effort performed by top scholars, resulting in a convenient summary of a complex topic, published in a prestigious outlet at the right moment in time. However, the Harvard Draft principles are ill-equipped for today’s modern society characterised by constant, fluid and substantive cross-border interaction, particularly via the Internet. Here, I will thus argue that a paradigm shift is overdue and I will provide a sketch of what a new paradigm may look like.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-74
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of International Law Unbound
Volume109
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

international law
jurisdiction
paradigm
public law
offense
Internet
interaction
Society
time

Cite this

@article{7af0c60f8699463080c5af7a26941314,
title = "A new jurisprudential framework for jurisdiction: Beyond the Harvard Draft",
abstract = "Eighty years ago, in 1935, a major step was taken in international law; the Harvard Research Draft Convention on Jurisdiction with Respect to Crime (“Harvard Draft”) was published in the American Journal of International Law. The influence of the Harvard Draft has been nothing but phenomenal and must surely have exceeded the drafters’ wildest ambitions. Indeed, it is fair to say that the structure put forward in the Harvard Draft has represented public international law’s approach to jurisdiction ever since.The most obvious reason the Harvard Draft has had such an enormous influence is of course found in the fact that it represents a sterling research effort performed by top scholars, resulting in a convenient summary of a complex topic, published in a prestigious outlet at the right moment in time. However, the Harvard Draft principles are ill-equipped for today’s modern society characterised by constant, fluid and substantive cross-border interaction, particularly via the Internet. Here, I will thus argue that a paradigm shift is overdue and I will provide a sketch of what a new paradigm may look like.",
author = "Svantesson, {Dan Jerker B}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1017/S2398772300001197",
language = "English",
volume = "109",
pages = "69--74",
journal = "American Journal of International Law Unbound",

}

A new jurisprudential framework for jurisdiction: Beyond the Harvard Draft. / Svantesson, Dan Jerker B.

In: American Journal of International Law Unbound, Vol. 109, 2015, p. 69-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new jurisprudential framework for jurisdiction: Beyond the Harvard Draft

AU - Svantesson, Dan Jerker B

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Eighty years ago, in 1935, a major step was taken in international law; the Harvard Research Draft Convention on Jurisdiction with Respect to Crime (“Harvard Draft”) was published in the American Journal of International Law. The influence of the Harvard Draft has been nothing but phenomenal and must surely have exceeded the drafters’ wildest ambitions. Indeed, it is fair to say that the structure put forward in the Harvard Draft has represented public international law’s approach to jurisdiction ever since.The most obvious reason the Harvard Draft has had such an enormous influence is of course found in the fact that it represents a sterling research effort performed by top scholars, resulting in a convenient summary of a complex topic, published in a prestigious outlet at the right moment in time. However, the Harvard Draft principles are ill-equipped for today’s modern society characterised by constant, fluid and substantive cross-border interaction, particularly via the Internet. Here, I will thus argue that a paradigm shift is overdue and I will provide a sketch of what a new paradigm may look like.

AB - Eighty years ago, in 1935, a major step was taken in international law; the Harvard Research Draft Convention on Jurisdiction with Respect to Crime (“Harvard Draft”) was published in the American Journal of International Law. The influence of the Harvard Draft has been nothing but phenomenal and must surely have exceeded the drafters’ wildest ambitions. Indeed, it is fair to say that the structure put forward in the Harvard Draft has represented public international law’s approach to jurisdiction ever since.The most obvious reason the Harvard Draft has had such an enormous influence is of course found in the fact that it represents a sterling research effort performed by top scholars, resulting in a convenient summary of a complex topic, published in a prestigious outlet at the right moment in time. However, the Harvard Draft principles are ill-equipped for today’s modern society characterised by constant, fluid and substantive cross-border interaction, particularly via the Internet. Here, I will thus argue that a paradigm shift is overdue and I will provide a sketch of what a new paradigm may look like.

U2 - 10.1017/S2398772300001197

DO - 10.1017/S2398772300001197

M3 - Article

VL - 109

SP - 69

EP - 74

JO - American Journal of International Law Unbound

JF - American Journal of International Law Unbound

ER -