A conceptual matrix of journalism as research two decades after 'Media Wars'

Mark Pearson, Roger Patching, Lisa Wilshere-Cumming

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

It is 20 years since John Hartley (1995) positioned journalism as the subject of academic research rather than as a research method in its own right. In 1999, Media International Australia devoted a themed edition to the debate over journalism in the academy ('Media Wars'), which prompted further scholarly discourse over the role and location of journalism as a field of study. This article reassesses that debate in the light of the acknowledgement of journalism studies and journalism creative works in the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) system, the use of journalism methods as a research methodology and the development of conceptual paradigms for journalism as research. The article surveys the relationship between journalism and research over the ensuing two decades and proposes a conceptual matrix of the journalism-research nexus.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-18
Number of pages14
JournalMedia International Australia
Volume156
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2015

Fingerprint

journalism
field of study
edition
academy
research method
paradigm
discourse
methodology

Cite this

Pearson, M., Patching, R., & Wilshere-Cumming, L. (2015). A conceptual matrix of journalism as research two decades after 'Media Wars'. Media International Australia, 156(1), 5-18.
Pearson, Mark ; Patching, Roger ; Wilshere-Cumming, Lisa. / A conceptual matrix of journalism as research two decades after 'Media Wars'. In: Media International Australia. 2015 ; Vol. 156, No. 1. pp. 5-18.
@article{2463c88f7cfe471ebaa872234c8aa403,
title = "A conceptual matrix of journalism as research two decades after 'Media Wars'",
abstract = "It is 20 years since John Hartley (1995) positioned journalism as the subject of academic research rather than as a research method in its own right. In 1999, Media International Australia devoted a themed edition to the debate over journalism in the academy ('Media Wars'), which prompted further scholarly discourse over the role and location of journalism as a field of study. This article reassesses that debate in the light of the acknowledgement of journalism studies and journalism creative works in the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) system, the use of journalism methods as a research methodology and the development of conceptual paradigms for journalism as research. The article surveys the relationship between journalism and research over the ensuing two decades and proposes a conceptual matrix of the journalism-research nexus.",
author = "Mark Pearson and Roger Patching and Lisa Wilshere-Cumming",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "156",
pages = "5--18",
journal = "Media International Australia",
issn = "1329-878X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Pearson, M, Patching, R & Wilshere-Cumming, L 2015, 'A conceptual matrix of journalism as research two decades after 'Media Wars'' Media International Australia, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 5-18.

A conceptual matrix of journalism as research two decades after 'Media Wars'. / Pearson, Mark; Patching, Roger; Wilshere-Cumming, Lisa.

In: Media International Australia, Vol. 156, No. 1, 01.08.2015, p. 5-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A conceptual matrix of journalism as research two decades after 'Media Wars'

AU - Pearson, Mark

AU - Patching, Roger

AU - Wilshere-Cumming, Lisa

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - It is 20 years since John Hartley (1995) positioned journalism as the subject of academic research rather than as a research method in its own right. In 1999, Media International Australia devoted a themed edition to the debate over journalism in the academy ('Media Wars'), which prompted further scholarly discourse over the role and location of journalism as a field of study. This article reassesses that debate in the light of the acknowledgement of journalism studies and journalism creative works in the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) system, the use of journalism methods as a research methodology and the development of conceptual paradigms for journalism as research. The article surveys the relationship between journalism and research over the ensuing two decades and proposes a conceptual matrix of the journalism-research nexus.

AB - It is 20 years since John Hartley (1995) positioned journalism as the subject of academic research rather than as a research method in its own right. In 1999, Media International Australia devoted a themed edition to the debate over journalism in the academy ('Media Wars'), which prompted further scholarly discourse over the role and location of journalism as a field of study. This article reassesses that debate in the light of the acknowledgement of journalism studies and journalism creative works in the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) system, the use of journalism methods as a research methodology and the development of conceptual paradigms for journalism as research. The article surveys the relationship between journalism and research over the ensuing two decades and proposes a conceptual matrix of the journalism-research nexus.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85000741738&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 156

SP - 5

EP - 18

JO - Media International Australia

JF - Media International Australia

SN - 1329-878X

IS - 1

ER -

Pearson M, Patching R, Wilshere-Cumming L. A conceptual matrix of journalism as research two decades after 'Media Wars'. Media International Australia. 2015 Aug 1;156(1):5-18.