A comparison of measures of hedging effectiveness: A case study using the Australian All Ordinaries Share Price Index Futures contract

Tim Brailsford, Katherine Corrigan, Richard Heaney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hedging is claimed to be of fundamental importance in managing the risk of an investment portfolio. Several techniques to assess the effectiveness of a hedge have been suggested in the literature. While these techniques hold theoretical appeal, there is little empirical evidence as to their usefulness. This paper provides an empirical comparison of three measures of hedge effectiveness in the context of hedging market risk using the Australian All Ordinaries Share Price Index Futures contract. The three measures are portfolio S.D. ranking, the Howard and D'Antonio [Howard, C.T., D'Antonio, L.J., 1987. A risk return measure of hedging effectiveness: a reply. J. Finan. Quant. Anal. 22(3), 377-381.] measure and the Lindahl [Lindahl, M., 1991. Risk-return hedging effectiveness measures for stock index futures. J. Futures Markets 11(4), 399-409.] measure. The results indicate that the selection of the particular measure of hedge effectiveness has an impact on the assessment of hedged portfolios. Further, the paper highlights problems that arise in the application of the Lindahl [Lindahl, M., 1991. Risk-return hedging effectiveness measures for stock index futures, J. Futures Markets 11(4), 399-409.] and Howard and D'Antonio [Howard, C.T., D'Antonio, L.J., 1987. A risk return measure of hedging effectiveness: a reply, J. Finan. Quant. Anal. 22(3), 377-381.] measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)465-481
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Multinational Financial Management
Volume11
Issue number4-5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hedging effectiveness
Share prices
Futures contracts
Risk-return
Price index
Hedge
Stock index futures
Hedging
Futures markets
Usefulness
Investment portfolio
Ranking
Market risk
Empirical evidence

Cite this

@article{5e266a960ed946aa8cbebf046edb739d,
title = "A comparison of measures of hedging effectiveness: A case study using the Australian All Ordinaries Share Price Index Futures contract",
abstract = "Hedging is claimed to be of fundamental importance in managing the risk of an investment portfolio. Several techniques to assess the effectiveness of a hedge have been suggested in the literature. While these techniques hold theoretical appeal, there is little empirical evidence as to their usefulness. This paper provides an empirical comparison of three measures of hedge effectiveness in the context of hedging market risk using the Australian All Ordinaries Share Price Index Futures contract. The three measures are portfolio S.D. ranking, the Howard and D'Antonio [Howard, C.T., D'Antonio, L.J., 1987. A risk return measure of hedging effectiveness: a reply. J. Finan. Quant. Anal. 22(3), 377-381.] measure and the Lindahl [Lindahl, M., 1991. Risk-return hedging effectiveness measures for stock index futures. J. Futures Markets 11(4), 399-409.] measure. The results indicate that the selection of the particular measure of hedge effectiveness has an impact on the assessment of hedged portfolios. Further, the paper highlights problems that arise in the application of the Lindahl [Lindahl, M., 1991. Risk-return hedging effectiveness measures for stock index futures, J. Futures Markets 11(4), 399-409.] and Howard and D'Antonio [Howard, C.T., D'Antonio, L.J., 1987. A risk return measure of hedging effectiveness: a reply, J. Finan. Quant. Anal. 22(3), 377-381.] measures.",
author = "Tim Brailsford and Katherine Corrigan and Richard Heaney",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1016/S1042-444X(01)00036-6",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "465--481",
journal = "Journal of Multinational Financial Management",
issn = "1042-444X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4-5",

}

A comparison of measures of hedging effectiveness : A case study using the Australian All Ordinaries Share Price Index Futures contract. / Brailsford, Tim; Corrigan, Katherine; Heaney, Richard.

In: Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Vol. 11, No. 4-5, 2001, p. 465-481.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of measures of hedging effectiveness

T2 - A case study using the Australian All Ordinaries Share Price Index Futures contract

AU - Brailsford, Tim

AU - Corrigan, Katherine

AU - Heaney, Richard

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Hedging is claimed to be of fundamental importance in managing the risk of an investment portfolio. Several techniques to assess the effectiveness of a hedge have been suggested in the literature. While these techniques hold theoretical appeal, there is little empirical evidence as to their usefulness. This paper provides an empirical comparison of three measures of hedge effectiveness in the context of hedging market risk using the Australian All Ordinaries Share Price Index Futures contract. The three measures are portfolio S.D. ranking, the Howard and D'Antonio [Howard, C.T., D'Antonio, L.J., 1987. A risk return measure of hedging effectiveness: a reply. J. Finan. Quant. Anal. 22(3), 377-381.] measure and the Lindahl [Lindahl, M., 1991. Risk-return hedging effectiveness measures for stock index futures. J. Futures Markets 11(4), 399-409.] measure. The results indicate that the selection of the particular measure of hedge effectiveness has an impact on the assessment of hedged portfolios. Further, the paper highlights problems that arise in the application of the Lindahl [Lindahl, M., 1991. Risk-return hedging effectiveness measures for stock index futures, J. Futures Markets 11(4), 399-409.] and Howard and D'Antonio [Howard, C.T., D'Antonio, L.J., 1987. A risk return measure of hedging effectiveness: a reply, J. Finan. Quant. Anal. 22(3), 377-381.] measures.

AB - Hedging is claimed to be of fundamental importance in managing the risk of an investment portfolio. Several techniques to assess the effectiveness of a hedge have been suggested in the literature. While these techniques hold theoretical appeal, there is little empirical evidence as to their usefulness. This paper provides an empirical comparison of three measures of hedge effectiveness in the context of hedging market risk using the Australian All Ordinaries Share Price Index Futures contract. The three measures are portfolio S.D. ranking, the Howard and D'Antonio [Howard, C.T., D'Antonio, L.J., 1987. A risk return measure of hedging effectiveness: a reply. J. Finan. Quant. Anal. 22(3), 377-381.] measure and the Lindahl [Lindahl, M., 1991. Risk-return hedging effectiveness measures for stock index futures. J. Futures Markets 11(4), 399-409.] measure. The results indicate that the selection of the particular measure of hedge effectiveness has an impact on the assessment of hedged portfolios. Further, the paper highlights problems that arise in the application of the Lindahl [Lindahl, M., 1991. Risk-return hedging effectiveness measures for stock index futures, J. Futures Markets 11(4), 399-409.] and Howard and D'Antonio [Howard, C.T., D'Antonio, L.J., 1987. A risk return measure of hedging effectiveness: a reply, J. Finan. Quant. Anal. 22(3), 377-381.] measures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042870245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1042-444X(01)00036-6

DO - 10.1016/S1042-444X(01)00036-6

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 465

EP - 481

JO - Journal of Multinational Financial Management

JF - Journal of Multinational Financial Management

SN - 1042-444X

IS - 4-5

ER -