A Comparison of Defects in Houses Constructed by Owners and Registered Builders in the Australian State of Victoria

Jim Georgiou, Peter Love, Jim Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The lack of attention to quality control by house builders in the Australian State of Victoria has been a contentious issue for more than two decades. In an attempt to improve the quality of housing, various mechanisms have been adopted and discarded by industry‐based organisations and government legislation. While builders are encouraged to improve construction quality, little is known and published about the quality of housing produced by owner builders. This paper presents findings from an ongoing research project that compares the defects in houses built by owner builders with those of registered builders. The initial findings suggest that there is no significant difference between the quality of housing procured by owner builders and registered builders. The functional elements within a house where defects are likely to occur are identified and discussed. The paper concludes by suggesting that the use of a registered builder’s management expertise does not necessarily guarantee a better quality product.
Original languageEnglish
JournalStructural Survey
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Defects
Quality control

Cite this

@article{1a8ff93750964c57a4d03b80e6aace19,
title = "A Comparison of Defects in Houses Constructed by Owners and Registered Builders in the Australian State of Victoria",
abstract = "The lack of attention to quality control by house builders in the Australian State of Victoria has been a contentious issue for more than two decades. In an attempt to improve the quality of housing, various mechanisms have been adopted and discarded by industry‐based organisations and government legislation. While builders are encouraged to improve construction quality, little is known and published about the quality of housing produced by owner builders. This paper presents findings from an ongoing research project that compares the defects in houses built by owner builders with those of registered builders. The initial findings suggest that there is no significant difference between the quality of housing procured by owner builders and registered builders. The functional elements within a house where defects are likely to occur are identified and discussed. The paper concludes by suggesting that the use of a registered builder’s management expertise does not necessarily guarantee a better quality product.",
author = "Jim Georgiou and Peter Love and Jim Smith",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1108/02630809910291343",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
journal = "International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation",
issn = "0263-080X",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

A Comparison of Defects in Houses Constructed by Owners and Registered Builders in the Australian State of Victoria. / Georgiou, Jim; Love, Peter; Smith, Jim.

In: Structural Survey, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1999.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of Defects in Houses Constructed by Owners and Registered Builders in the Australian State of Victoria

AU - Georgiou, Jim

AU - Love, Peter

AU - Smith, Jim

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - The lack of attention to quality control by house builders in the Australian State of Victoria has been a contentious issue for more than two decades. In an attempt to improve the quality of housing, various mechanisms have been adopted and discarded by industry‐based organisations and government legislation. While builders are encouraged to improve construction quality, little is known and published about the quality of housing produced by owner builders. This paper presents findings from an ongoing research project that compares the defects in houses built by owner builders with those of registered builders. The initial findings suggest that there is no significant difference between the quality of housing procured by owner builders and registered builders. The functional elements within a house where defects are likely to occur are identified and discussed. The paper concludes by suggesting that the use of a registered builder’s management expertise does not necessarily guarantee a better quality product.

AB - The lack of attention to quality control by house builders in the Australian State of Victoria has been a contentious issue for more than two decades. In an attempt to improve the quality of housing, various mechanisms have been adopted and discarded by industry‐based organisations and government legislation. While builders are encouraged to improve construction quality, little is known and published about the quality of housing produced by owner builders. This paper presents findings from an ongoing research project that compares the defects in houses built by owner builders with those of registered builders. The initial findings suggest that there is no significant difference between the quality of housing procured by owner builders and registered builders. The functional elements within a house where defects are likely to occur are identified and discussed. The paper concludes by suggesting that the use of a registered builder’s management expertise does not necessarily guarantee a better quality product.

U2 - 10.1108/02630809910291343

DO - 10.1108/02630809910291343

M3 - Article

VL - 17

JO - International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation

JF - International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation

SN - 0263-080X

IS - 3

ER -