A comparative study of fashion and IP: Trade marks in Europe and Australia

William Van Caenegem, Violet Atkinson, Viviane Azard, Julien Canlorbe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract


•Design registration and copyright are the central mechanisms for IP protection of the appearance of fashion garments, and trade mark law may seem of little relevance at first glance.


•However, since the adoption of the World Trade Organization’s TRIPS standards for registered trade mark protection, the dividing line between product and trade mark has become much less pronounced. In particular, the shape of goods and colours as such are eligible for trade mark registration. Other decorative features, such as patterns (the Burberry check for instance) or stitching, and other non-traditional trade marks may also be registered under certain conditions. This presents interesting opportunities to fashion labels, which can obtain perpetual protection for some of their most striking or memorable visual features through trade mark registration.


•This article compares the state of the law on this topic in Australia and France, contrasting jurisdictions in terms of the underlying legal systems but also in terms of the relative importance of the fashion industry. Although the formal requirements and tests of the law in the two countries seem quite different, very similar results are obtained in many respects. In both countries there are serious obstacles to registration, and once a non-traditional mark is registered it is not easy to obtain a remedy against a competitor who adopts a similar feature. The concept of use of a mark as a mark, both for the sake of registration on the basis of acquired distinctiveness, and in enforcement, concerns judges in both jurisdictions. Infringing use is also problematical.
LanguageEnglish
Pages194-211
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Intellectual Property & Law Practice
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

jurisdiction
trade law
Law
legal system
WTO
remedies
France
industry

Cite this

Van Caenegem, William ; Atkinson, Violet ; Azard, Viviane ; Canlorbe, Julien. / A comparative study of fashion and IP : Trade marks in Europe and Australia. In: Journal of Intellectual Property & Law Practice. 2018 ; Vol. 13, No. 3. pp. 194-211.
@article{8b88533067c04b8fb1488c5d042aa5d5,
title = "A comparative study of fashion and IP: Trade marks in Europe and Australia",
abstract = "•Design registration and copyright are the central mechanisms for IP protection of the appearance of fashion garments, and trade mark law may seem of little relevance at first glance.•However, since the adoption of the World Trade Organization’s TRIPS standards for registered trade mark protection, the dividing line between product and trade mark has become much less pronounced. In particular, the shape of goods and colours as such are eligible for trade mark registration. Other decorative features, such as patterns (the Burberry check for instance) or stitching, and other non-traditional trade marks may also be registered under certain conditions. This presents interesting opportunities to fashion labels, which can obtain perpetual protection for some of their most striking or memorable visual features through trade mark registration.•This article compares the state of the law on this topic in Australia and France, contrasting jurisdictions in terms of the underlying legal systems but also in terms of the relative importance of the fashion industry. Although the formal requirements and tests of the law in the two countries seem quite different, very similar results are obtained in many respects. In both countries there are serious obstacles to registration, and once a non-traditional mark is registered it is not easy to obtain a remedy against a competitor who adopts a similar feature. The concept of use of a mark as a mark, both for the sake of registration on the basis of acquired distinctiveness, and in enforcement, concerns judges in both jurisdictions. Infringing use is also problematical.",
author = "{Van Caenegem}, William and Violet Atkinson and Viviane Azard and Julien Canlorbe",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1093/jiplp/jpx190",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "194--211",
journal = "Journal of Intellectual Property & Law Practice",
issn = "1747-1532",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

A comparative study of fashion and IP : Trade marks in Europe and Australia. / Van Caenegem, William; Atkinson, Violet; Azard, Viviane; Canlorbe, Julien.

In: Journal of Intellectual Property & Law Practice, Vol. 13, No. 3, 05.02.2018, p. 194-211.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of fashion and IP

T2 - Journal of Intellectual Property & Law Practice

AU - Van Caenegem, William

AU - Atkinson, Violet

AU - Azard, Viviane

AU - Canlorbe, Julien

PY - 2018/2/5

Y1 - 2018/2/5

N2 - •Design registration and copyright are the central mechanisms for IP protection of the appearance of fashion garments, and trade mark law may seem of little relevance at first glance.•However, since the adoption of the World Trade Organization’s TRIPS standards for registered trade mark protection, the dividing line between product and trade mark has become much less pronounced. In particular, the shape of goods and colours as such are eligible for trade mark registration. Other decorative features, such as patterns (the Burberry check for instance) or stitching, and other non-traditional trade marks may also be registered under certain conditions. This presents interesting opportunities to fashion labels, which can obtain perpetual protection for some of their most striking or memorable visual features through trade mark registration.•This article compares the state of the law on this topic in Australia and France, contrasting jurisdictions in terms of the underlying legal systems but also in terms of the relative importance of the fashion industry. Although the formal requirements and tests of the law in the two countries seem quite different, very similar results are obtained in many respects. In both countries there are serious obstacles to registration, and once a non-traditional mark is registered it is not easy to obtain a remedy against a competitor who adopts a similar feature. The concept of use of a mark as a mark, both for the sake of registration on the basis of acquired distinctiveness, and in enforcement, concerns judges in both jurisdictions. Infringing use is also problematical.

AB - •Design registration and copyright are the central mechanisms for IP protection of the appearance of fashion garments, and trade mark law may seem of little relevance at first glance.•However, since the adoption of the World Trade Organization’s TRIPS standards for registered trade mark protection, the dividing line between product and trade mark has become much less pronounced. In particular, the shape of goods and colours as such are eligible for trade mark registration. Other decorative features, such as patterns (the Burberry check for instance) or stitching, and other non-traditional trade marks may also be registered under certain conditions. This presents interesting opportunities to fashion labels, which can obtain perpetual protection for some of their most striking or memorable visual features through trade mark registration.•This article compares the state of the law on this topic in Australia and France, contrasting jurisdictions in terms of the underlying legal systems but also in terms of the relative importance of the fashion industry. Although the formal requirements and tests of the law in the two countries seem quite different, very similar results are obtained in many respects. In both countries there are serious obstacles to registration, and once a non-traditional mark is registered it is not easy to obtain a remedy against a competitor who adopts a similar feature. The concept of use of a mark as a mark, both for the sake of registration on the basis of acquired distinctiveness, and in enforcement, concerns judges in both jurisdictions. Infringing use is also problematical.

U2 - 10.1093/jiplp/jpx190

DO - 10.1093/jiplp/jpx190

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 194

EP - 211

JO - Journal of Intellectual Property & Law Practice

JF - Journal of Intellectual Property & Law Practice

SN - 1747-1532

IS - 3

ER -