TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparative study of construction industry size and structure between the UK and Australia and the significance of industry fragmentation
AU - Langston, Craig Ashley
AU - Wu, Min
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - While comparing both the size and structure between the UK and Australian construction industries, this study reveals that the UK construction industry is about two and a half times larger than the Australian construction industry, and both industries are dominated by the proportion of small firms. The issue of fragmentation is characteristic of the construction industries in these two countries, and beyond. This study then develops a self recruiting-subletting cost indifference point model to explain why fragmentation occurs. Although the high proportion of small firms in the construction industry has been criticised as it prevents the exploitation of economies of scale, the self recruiting-subletting cost indifference point model theoretically proposes that subletting is usually profitable for construction firms. Thus the size distribution of the construction industry has a propensity to skew towards small firms.
AB - While comparing both the size and structure between the UK and Australian construction industries, this study reveals that the UK construction industry is about two and a half times larger than the Australian construction industry, and both industries are dominated by the proportion of small firms. The issue of fragmentation is characteristic of the construction industries in these two countries, and beyond. This study then develops a self recruiting-subletting cost indifference point model to explain why fragmentation occurs. Although the high proportion of small firms in the construction industry has been criticised as it prevents the exploitation of economies of scale, the self recruiting-subletting cost indifference point model theoretically proposes that subletting is usually profitable for construction firms. Thus the size distribution of the construction industry has a propensity to skew towards small firms.
U2 - 10.1080/15623599.2006.10773081
DO - 10.1080/15623599.2006.10773081
M3 - Article
SN - 1562-3599
VL - 6
SP - 45
EP - 61
JO - The International Journal of Construction Management
JF - The International Journal of Construction Management
IS - 1
ER -