A century of cardiac rehabilitation research: Bibliometric review of publication history, keyword trends, and citations

  • Deborah Manandi*
  • , Karice Hyun
  • , Dion Candelaria
  • , Matthew A. Hollings
  • , Qiang Tu
  • , Sarah Gauci
  • , Adrienne O'Neil
  • , Georgia K Chaseling
  • , Ling Zhang
  • , Tom Briffa
  • , Sherry L. Grace
  • , Robyn Gallagher
  • , Julie Redfern
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Research into cardiac rehabilitation (CR), a key model for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, has evolved since first described in 1927. This review aimed to explore this evolution by identifying CR-related publications from the Web of Science Core Collection and summarizing CR research publication history, trends in publication keywords, and citations over time. A total of 8729 CR publications appeared across 1441 journals (median impact factor: 2.6) and were cited 315,819 times, with over 85% (7455/8729) published in the past two decades. These publications involved contributions from 26,909 authors across 120 countries, despite disproportionate domination by high-income countries. Publication keywords have consistently focused on exercise but have evolved from evaluating clinical events, quality-of-life, and return-to-work outcomes to improving accessibility using digital interventions. However, a broader focus on other cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, and various research designs may be needed to modernize CR, particularly in lower-income countries.
Original languageEnglish
Article number26
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalNPJ cardiovascular health
Volume2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Jun 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A century of cardiac rehabilitation research: Bibliometric review of publication history, keyword trends, and citations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this