A biomechanical analysis of the Stand Up Paddle Board Stroke: a comparative study: A comparative study

Ben Schram, James Furness, Kevin Kemp-Smith, Jason Sharp, Matthew Cristini, Daniel Harvey, Emma Keady, Maichel Ghobrial, Joshoa Tussler, Wayne A Hing, Jeff Nessler, Matthew Becker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Stand-up paddle boarding (SUP) is a rapidly growing global aquatic
sport, with increasing popularity among participants within recreation, competition and rehabilitation. To date, few scientific studies have focused on SUP. Further, there is no research examining the biomechanics of the SUP paddle stroke. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether variations in kinematics existed among experienced and inexperienced SUP participants using three-dimensional motion analysis. This data could be of significance to participants, researchers, coaches and health practitioners to improve performance and inform injury minimization strategies.
Methods: A cross-sectional observational design study was performed with seven experienced and 19 inexperienced paddlers whereby whole-body kinematic data were acquired using a six-camera Vicon motion capture system. Participants paddled on a SUP ergometer while three-dimensional range of motion (ROM) and peak joint angles were calculated for the shoulders, elbows, hips and trunk. Mann–Whitney U tests were conducted on the non-normally distributed data to evaluate differences between level of expertise.
Results: Significant differences in joint kinematics were found between experienced and inexperienced participants, with inexperienced participants using greater overall shoulder ROM (78.9 ± 24.9 vs 56.6 ± 17.3, p = 0.010) and less hip ROM than the experienced participants (50.0 ± 18.5 vs 66.4 ± 11.8, p = 0.035). Experienced participants demonstrated increased shoulder motion at the end of the paddle stoke compared to the inexperienced participants (74.9 ± 16.3 vs 35.2 ± 28.5, p = 0.001 minimum shoulder flexion) and more extension at the elbow (6.0 ± 9.2 minimum elbow flexion vs 24.8 ± 13.5, p = 0.000) than the inexperienced participants.
Discussion: The results of this study indicate several significant kinematic differences between the experienced and inexperienced SUP participants. These variations in technique were noted in the shoulder, elbow and hip and are evident in other aquatic paddling sports where injury rates are higher in these joints. These finding may be valuable for coaches, therapists and participants needing to maximize performance and minimize injury risk during participation in SUP.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere8006
JournalPEERJ
Volume2019
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

shoulders
stroke
Biomechanical Phenomena
elbows
Elbow
kinematics
Stroke
Articular Range of Motion
hips
Hip
Kinematics
Joints
Recreation
Athletic Injuries
rehabilitation (people)
Wounds and Injuries
recreation
sports
joints (animal)
cameras

Cite this

Schram, Ben ; Furness, James ; Kemp-Smith, Kevin ; Sharp, Jason ; Cristini, Matthew ; Harvey, Daniel ; Keady, Emma ; Ghobrial, Maichel ; Tussler, Joshoa ; Hing, Wayne A ; Nessler, Jeff ; Becker, Matthew. / A biomechanical analysis of the Stand Up Paddle Board Stroke: a comparative study : A comparative study. In: PEERJ. 2019 ; Vol. 2019, No. 11.
@article{0cd93ea405714a9b8adfe6f30b0bc321,
title = "A biomechanical analysis of the Stand Up Paddle Board Stroke: a comparative study: A comparative study",
abstract = "Background: Stand-up paddle boarding (SUP) is a rapidly growing global aquaticsport, with increasing popularity among participants within recreation, competition and rehabilitation. To date, few scientific studies have focused on SUP. Further, there is no research examining the biomechanics of the SUP paddle stroke. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether variations in kinematics existed among experienced and inexperienced SUP participants using three-dimensional motion analysis. This data could be of significance to participants, researchers, coaches and health practitioners to improve performance and inform injury minimization strategies. Methods: A cross-sectional observational design study was performed with seven experienced and 19 inexperienced paddlers whereby whole-body kinematic data were acquired using a six-camera Vicon motion capture system. Participants paddled on a SUP ergometer while three-dimensional range of motion (ROM) and peak joint angles were calculated for the shoulders, elbows, hips and trunk. Mann–Whitney U tests were conducted on the non-normally distributed data to evaluate differences between level of expertise.Results: Significant differences in joint kinematics were found between experienced and inexperienced participants, with inexperienced participants using greater overall shoulder ROM (78.9 ± 24.9 vs 56.6 ± 17.3, p = 0.010) and less hip ROM than the experienced participants (50.0 ± 18.5 vs 66.4 ± 11.8, p = 0.035). Experienced participants demonstrated increased shoulder motion at the end of the paddle stoke compared to the inexperienced participants (74.9 ± 16.3 vs 35.2 ± 28.5, p = 0.001 minimum shoulder flexion) and more extension at the elbow (6.0 ± 9.2 minimum elbow flexion vs 24.8 ± 13.5, p = 0.000) than the inexperienced participants.Discussion: The results of this study indicate several significant kinematic differences between the experienced and inexperienced SUP participants. These variations in technique were noted in the shoulder, elbow and hip and are evident in other aquatic paddling sports where injury rates are higher in these joints. These finding may be valuable for coaches, therapists and participants needing to maximize performance and minimize injury risk during participation in SUP.",
author = "Ben Schram and James Furness and Kevin Kemp-Smith and Jason Sharp and Matthew Cristini and Daniel Harvey and Emma Keady and Maichel Ghobrial and Joshoa Tussler and Hing, {Wayne A} and Jeff Nessler and Matthew Becker",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7717/peerj.8006",
language = "English",
volume = "2019",
journal = "PEERJ",
issn = "2167-8359",
publisher = "PEERJ INC",
number = "11",

}

Schram, B, Furness, J, Kemp-Smith, K, Sharp, J, Cristini, M, Harvey, D, Keady, E, Ghobrial, M, Tussler, J, Hing, WA, Nessler, J & Becker, M 2019, 'A biomechanical analysis of the Stand Up Paddle Board Stroke: a comparative study: A comparative study' PEERJ, vol. 2019, no. 11, e8006. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8006, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8006

A biomechanical analysis of the Stand Up Paddle Board Stroke: a comparative study : A comparative study. / Schram, Ben; Furness, James; Kemp-Smith, Kevin; Sharp, Jason ; Cristini, Matthew; Harvey, Daniel ; Keady, Emma; Ghobrial, Maichel; Tussler, Joshoa; Hing, Wayne A; Nessler, Jeff; Becker, Matthew.

In: PEERJ, Vol. 2019, No. 11, e8006, 01.11.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A biomechanical analysis of the Stand Up Paddle Board Stroke: a comparative study

T2 - A comparative study

AU - Schram, Ben

AU - Furness, James

AU - Kemp-Smith, Kevin

AU - Sharp, Jason

AU - Cristini, Matthew

AU - Harvey, Daniel

AU - Keady, Emma

AU - Ghobrial, Maichel

AU - Tussler, Joshoa

AU - Hing, Wayne A

AU - Nessler, Jeff

AU - Becker, Matthew

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - Background: Stand-up paddle boarding (SUP) is a rapidly growing global aquaticsport, with increasing popularity among participants within recreation, competition and rehabilitation. To date, few scientific studies have focused on SUP. Further, there is no research examining the biomechanics of the SUP paddle stroke. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether variations in kinematics existed among experienced and inexperienced SUP participants using three-dimensional motion analysis. This data could be of significance to participants, researchers, coaches and health practitioners to improve performance and inform injury minimization strategies. Methods: A cross-sectional observational design study was performed with seven experienced and 19 inexperienced paddlers whereby whole-body kinematic data were acquired using a six-camera Vicon motion capture system. Participants paddled on a SUP ergometer while three-dimensional range of motion (ROM) and peak joint angles were calculated for the shoulders, elbows, hips and trunk. Mann–Whitney U tests were conducted on the non-normally distributed data to evaluate differences between level of expertise.Results: Significant differences in joint kinematics were found between experienced and inexperienced participants, with inexperienced participants using greater overall shoulder ROM (78.9 ± 24.9 vs 56.6 ± 17.3, p = 0.010) and less hip ROM than the experienced participants (50.0 ± 18.5 vs 66.4 ± 11.8, p = 0.035). Experienced participants demonstrated increased shoulder motion at the end of the paddle stoke compared to the inexperienced participants (74.9 ± 16.3 vs 35.2 ± 28.5, p = 0.001 minimum shoulder flexion) and more extension at the elbow (6.0 ± 9.2 minimum elbow flexion vs 24.8 ± 13.5, p = 0.000) than the inexperienced participants.Discussion: The results of this study indicate several significant kinematic differences between the experienced and inexperienced SUP participants. These variations in technique were noted in the shoulder, elbow and hip and are evident in other aquatic paddling sports where injury rates are higher in these joints. These finding may be valuable for coaches, therapists and participants needing to maximize performance and minimize injury risk during participation in SUP.

AB - Background: Stand-up paddle boarding (SUP) is a rapidly growing global aquaticsport, with increasing popularity among participants within recreation, competition and rehabilitation. To date, few scientific studies have focused on SUP. Further, there is no research examining the biomechanics of the SUP paddle stroke. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether variations in kinematics existed among experienced and inexperienced SUP participants using three-dimensional motion analysis. This data could be of significance to participants, researchers, coaches and health practitioners to improve performance and inform injury minimization strategies. Methods: A cross-sectional observational design study was performed with seven experienced and 19 inexperienced paddlers whereby whole-body kinematic data were acquired using a six-camera Vicon motion capture system. Participants paddled on a SUP ergometer while three-dimensional range of motion (ROM) and peak joint angles were calculated for the shoulders, elbows, hips and trunk. Mann–Whitney U tests were conducted on the non-normally distributed data to evaluate differences between level of expertise.Results: Significant differences in joint kinematics were found between experienced and inexperienced participants, with inexperienced participants using greater overall shoulder ROM (78.9 ± 24.9 vs 56.6 ± 17.3, p = 0.010) and less hip ROM than the experienced participants (50.0 ± 18.5 vs 66.4 ± 11.8, p = 0.035). Experienced participants demonstrated increased shoulder motion at the end of the paddle stoke compared to the inexperienced participants (74.9 ± 16.3 vs 35.2 ± 28.5, p = 0.001 minimum shoulder flexion) and more extension at the elbow (6.0 ± 9.2 minimum elbow flexion vs 24.8 ± 13.5, p = 0.000) than the inexperienced participants.Discussion: The results of this study indicate several significant kinematic differences between the experienced and inexperienced SUP participants. These variations in technique were noted in the shoulder, elbow and hip and are evident in other aquatic paddling sports where injury rates are higher in these joints. These finding may be valuable for coaches, therapists and participants needing to maximize performance and minimize injury risk during participation in SUP.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074293310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7717/peerj.8006

DO - 10.7717/peerj.8006

M3 - Article

VL - 2019

JO - PEERJ

JF - PEERJ

SN - 2167-8359

IS - 11

M1 - e8006

ER -