A battle and a gamble: The spectre of an adverse costs order in constitutional litigation

Patrick Keyzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Extract: With the notable exception that an Attorney-General intervening is not liable to pay or entitled to receive costs, the High Court has almost invariably applied the indemnity rule, which is that the winner receives their costs of the litigation from the loser. This rule applies to the 'substantive' issues raised in a case and also to procedural' arguments over such things as standing. Constitutional cases are treated no differently from other cases. No special privilege applies to constitutional cases in light of the significant function they have in securing the rule of law through judicial review. In other words, you may need to pay the government to ensure that its acts are constitutional.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)82-93
Number of pages12
JournalBond Law Review
Volume22
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

indemnity
costs
constitutional state
privilege

Cite this

@article{06bbb1916ef44beead007bfff771391d,
title = "A battle and a gamble: The spectre of an adverse costs order in constitutional litigation",
abstract = "Extract: With the notable exception that an Attorney-General intervening is not liable to pay or entitled to receive costs, the High Court has almost invariably applied the indemnity rule, which is that the winner receives their costs of the litigation from the loser. This rule applies to the 'substantive' issues raised in a case and also to procedural' arguments over such things as standing. Constitutional cases are treated no differently from other cases. No special privilege applies to constitutional cases in light of the significant function they have in securing the rule of law through judicial review. In other words, you may need to pay the government to ensure that its acts are constitutional.",
author = "Patrick Keyzer",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "82--93",
journal = "Bond Law Review",
issn = "1033-4505",
publisher = "Bond University Press",
number = "3",

}

A battle and a gamble : The spectre of an adverse costs order in constitutional litigation. / Keyzer, Patrick.

In: Bond Law Review, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2010, p. 82-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A battle and a gamble

T2 - The spectre of an adverse costs order in constitutional litigation

AU - Keyzer, Patrick

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Extract: With the notable exception that an Attorney-General intervening is not liable to pay or entitled to receive costs, the High Court has almost invariably applied the indemnity rule, which is that the winner receives their costs of the litigation from the loser. This rule applies to the 'substantive' issues raised in a case and also to procedural' arguments over such things as standing. Constitutional cases are treated no differently from other cases. No special privilege applies to constitutional cases in light of the significant function they have in securing the rule of law through judicial review. In other words, you may need to pay the government to ensure that its acts are constitutional.

AB - Extract: With the notable exception that an Attorney-General intervening is not liable to pay or entitled to receive costs, the High Court has almost invariably applied the indemnity rule, which is that the winner receives their costs of the litigation from the loser. This rule applies to the 'substantive' issues raised in a case and also to procedural' arguments over such things as standing. Constitutional cases are treated no differently from other cases. No special privilege applies to constitutional cases in light of the significant function they have in securing the rule of law through judicial review. In other words, you may need to pay the government to ensure that its acts are constitutional.

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 82

EP - 93

JO - Bond Law Review

JF - Bond Law Review

SN - 1033-4505

IS - 3

ER -