Research output per year
Research output per year
Project Details
Description
Doctors are placed under significant pressure to engage in research for career progression. Our review suggests that research selection criteria for specialty training programs incentivise high-volume, CV-padding research, focusing on quantity and authorship position over research quality. These selection criteria may be unintended drivers of research waste.
Project Aims
To examine the research entry requirements of Australian and New Zealand Medical Specialist Training programs.
| Status | Finished |
|---|---|
| Effective start/end date | 22/07/20 → 23/12/20 |
Fingerprint
Explore the research topics touched on by this project. These labels are generated based on the underlying awards/grants. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Related Research Outputs
- 1 Letter
-
Selection criteria for Australian and New Zealand medical specialist training programs: another under-recognised driver of research waste
Withers, C., Noble, C., Brandenburg, C., Glasziou, P. P. & Stehlik, P., 4 Oct 2021, In: The Medical journal of Australia. 215, 7, p. 336-336.e1Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Research › peer-review
Open Access2 Citations (Scopus)
Related Activities
- 1 Invited talk
-
Research in Surgery - Finding the balance
Paulina Stehlik (Speaker), Christy Noble (Speaker) & Paul Glasziou (Speaker)
5 May 2022Activity: Talk or presentation › Invited talk