Results of a survey to develop an extension to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) Statement on good reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, in the form of a checklist, to guide the writing of abstracts for systematic reviews

Dataset

Description

Starting with a list of possible checklist items generated from the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) Statement and other published guidance, a three-round modified Delphi survey involving 100 experts was used to refine the checklist items. The data also includes qualitative responses on what respondents thought should be included in a systematic review.

Contact the creator for access to the dataset.
Date made available2011
PublisherBond University
Date of data production2011

Related Research Outputs

PRISMA for abstracts: Reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts

Beller, E. M., Glasziou, P. P., Altman, D. G., Hopewell, S., Bastian, H., Chalmers, I., Gøtzsche, P. C., Lasserson, T. & Tovey, D., Apr 2013, In : PLoS Medicine. 10, 4, e1001419.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Open Access
File
  • 226 Citations (Scopus)
    131 Downloads (Pure)

    Cite this

    Beller, E. M. (Creator) (2011). Results of a survey to develop an extension to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) Statement on good reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, in the form of a checklist, to guide the writing of abstracts for systematic reviews. Bond University. 10.4225/57/58ad17fd0fc41